Relationship between Soybean Protein Isolate and Textural Properties of Texturized Vegetable Protein
-
Published:2023-11-07
Issue:22
Volume:28
Page:7465
-
ISSN:1420-3049
-
Container-title:Molecules
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Molecules
Author:
Li Lin123, Huang Yatao23ORCID, Liu Yanfang3, Xiong Yangyang3, Wang Xinrui3, Tong Litao3ORCID, Wang Fengzhong3, Fan Bei2, Bai Xiaojia1
Affiliation:
1. State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China 2. Western Agricultural Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changji 831100, China 3. Key Laboratory of Agro-Products Quality and Safety Control in Storage and Transport Process, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
Abstract
To identify the ideal soybean protein isolate for texturized vegetable protein processing, the effect of different soybean protein isolates on texturized vegetable protein composition was studied. Three different types of soybean protein isolates were selected and analyzed for functional properties (water holding capacity (WHC), emulsifying properties, foaming properties), amino acid content, and protein secondary structure. Then, using the same formulation, the soybean protein isolates were extruded to produce texturized vegetable protein, and its textural properties, degree of texturization, microstructure, free sulfhydryl (free SH), and disulfide (S-S) content were determined. Lastly, a correlation analysis was performed to examine the connection between soybean protein isolates and texturized vegetable proteins. After correlation analysis, the soybean protein isolate functional properties that affect the textural properties of the texturized vegetable protein were as follows: the emulsifying property affected the hardness, adhesiveness, springiness, gumminess, and chewiness of the texturized vegetable proteins; and the foaming property affected the gumminess, chewiness, and the degree of texturization of the texturized vegetable proteins. In addition, 16 amino acids including threonine (Thr), methionine (Met), and arginine (Arg) affect texturized vegetable proteins, mainly with respect to adhesiveness, springiness, and free SH. The effects of secondary structure (α-helix, random coil) on texturized vegetable proteins were degree of texturization, resilience, and cohesion, respectively. Therefore, choosing the soybean protein isolate with better emulsifying and foaming properties provides a more suitable approach for processing texturized vegetable protein.
Funder
Special National Key Research and Development Plan China Agriculture Research System earmarked fund for the Xinjiang Agriculture Research System
Subject
Chemistry (miscellaneous),Analytical Chemistry,Organic Chemistry,Physical and Theoretical Chemistry,Molecular Medicine,Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science
Reference63 articles.
1. Meat analogues: Health promising sustainable meat substitutes;Kumar;Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.,2017 2. Plant-based and cell-based approaches to meat production;Rubio;Nat. Commun.,2020 3. Artificial meat and the future of the meat industry;Bonny;Anim. Prod. Sci.,2017 4. Hertzler, S.R., Lieblein-Boff, J.C., Weiler, M., and Allgeier, C. (2020). Plant Proteins: Assessing Their Nutritional Quality and Effects on Health and Physical Function. Nutrients, 12. 5. Alcorta, A., Porta, A., Tarrega, A., Alvarez, M.D., and Vaquero, M.P. (2021). Foods for Plant-Based Diets: Challenges and Innovations. Foods, 10.
|
|