The Derivation and External Validation of a Fibrosis Risk Model for Colorectal Tumours Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Author:

Sferrazza Sandro1ORCID,Maida Marcello23ORCID,Calabrese Giulio1ORCID,Facciorusso Antonio4ORCID,Fuccio Lorenzo56,Frazzoni Leonardo67ORCID,Maselli Roberta89,Repici Alessandro89,Di Mitri Roberto1,Santos-Antunes João10ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, “ARNAS Civico-Di Cristina-Benfratelli” Hospital, 90127 Palermo, Italy

2. Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna ‘Kore’, 94100 Enna, Italy

3. Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Umberto I, 94100 Enna, Italy

4. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 71122 Foggia, Italy

5. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, 40123 Bologna, Italy

6. IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy

7. Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forli, Italy

8. Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano, Italy

9. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20089 Pieve Emanuele, Italy

10. Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced technique that can become more challenging in the presence of submucosal fibrosis. Predicting the grade of fibrosis is important in order to identify technically difficult ESD. Aims and Methods: Our study aimed to derive and validate a prediction model to determine the preoperative degree of submucosal fibrosis in colorectal tumours undergoing ESD. A predictive model was developed to derive the probability of an increasing submucosal fibrosis in the derivation cohort and then externally validated. Results: 309 patients (age: 68 ± 10.9 years) underwent colorectal ESD between January 2016 and June 2020. F0, F1, and F2 fibroses were reported in 196 (63.4%), 70 (22.6%), and 43 (13.9%) cases, respectively. R0 resection was found in 266 (87%) lesions. At multivariable analysis in the derivation cohort, lesion morphology (OR = 0.37 and CI = 0.14–0.97 for LST-NG vs. 0-Is; OR = 0.29 and CI = 0.1–0.87 for the LST mixed type vs. 0-Is; and OR = 0.32 and CI = 0.1–1.03 for LST-G vs. 0-Is) and increasing size (OR = 1.02 and CI = 1.01–1.04 for a 1 mm increase) were significantly associated with an increasing degree of fibrosis. The model had fair discriminating ability in the derivation group (AUROC = 0.61 and CI = 0.52–0.69 for F1–F2 vs. F0 fibroses; AUROC = 0.61 and CI = 0.45–0.77 for F2 vs. F0–F1 fibroses) and in the validation group (AUROC = 0.71 and CI = 0.59–0.83 for F1–F2 vs. F0 fibroses; AUROC = 0.65 and CI = 0.52–0.77 for F2 vs. F0–F1 fibroses). Conclusions: Our findings introduce a new tool for the stratification of ESD technical difficulty based on lesion size and morphological characteristics which could become crucial during the procedure’s planning process.

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3