A Critical Examination of Academic Hospital Practices—Paving the Way for Standardized Structured Reports in Neuroimaging

Author:

Alruwaili Ashwag Rafea12ORCID,Jamea Abdullah Abu34ORCID,Alayed Reema N.5ORCID,Alebrah Alhatoun Y.4,Alshowaiman Reem Y.4,Almugbel Loulwah A.6,Heikal Ataf G.1,Alkhanbashi Ahad S.7,Maflahi Anwar A.18

Affiliation:

1. Radiological Sciences Department, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

2. Scientists Unit, Central Research Laboratory, King Saud University, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia

3. College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

4. Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh 145111, Saudi Arabia

5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center (KFSHRC), Riyadh 12713, Saudi Arabia

6. Cath Lab, Radiological Imaging, Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Riyadh 11625, Saudi Arabia

7. Radiology Department, Ad Diriyah Hospital, Riyadh 13717, Saudi Arabia

8. Health Gates—Center of Excellence for Primary Health Care, Riyadh 12214, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Imaging studies are often an integral part of patient evaluation and serve as the primary means of communication between radiologists and referring physicians. This study aimed to evaluate brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) reports and to determine whether these reports follow a standardized or narrative format. Methods: A series of 466 anonymized MRI reports from an academic hospital were downloaded from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) in portable document format (pdf) for the period between August 2017 and March 2018. Two hundred brain MRI reports, written by four radiologists, were compared to a structured report template from the Radiology Society of North America (RSNA) and were included, whereas MR-modified techniques, such as MRI orbits and MR venography reports, were excluded (n = 266). All statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software (version 16.4.1, MedCalc Software). Results: None of the included studies used the RSNA template for structured reports (SRs). The highest number of brain-reported pathologies was for vascular disease (24%), while the lowest was for infections (3.5%) and motor dysfunction (5.5%). Radiologists specified the Technique (n = 170, 85%), Clinical Information (n = 187, 93.5%), and Impression (n = 197, 98.5%) in almost all reports. However, information in the Findings section was often missing. As hypothesized, radiologists with less experience showed a greater commitment to reporting additional elements than those with more experience. Conclusions: The SR template for medical imaging has been accessible online for over a decade. However, many hospitals and radiologists still use the free-text style for reporting. Our study was conducted in an academic hospital with a fellowship program, and we found that structured reporting had not yet been implemented. As the health system transitions towards teleservices and teleradiology, more efforts need to be put into advocating standardized reporting in medical imaging.

Funder

Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3