Mate Choice Plurality, Choice Overload, and Singlehood: Are More Options Always Better?

Author:

Apostolou Menelaos1ORCID,Constantinidou Loukia1,Kagialis Antonios2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, 46 Makedonitissas Ave., Nicosia 1700, Cyprus

2. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 710 03 Heraklion, Greece

Abstract

A lack of options can make it challenging for individuals to find a desirable intimate partner. Conversely, an abundance of choices might lead to mate choice overload, making it difficult to determine the most suitable match. Additionally, having numerous alternatives after entering a relationship could undermine its stability by decreasing satisfaction with the current partner. The present research aimed to examine the effects of mate choice plurality on singlehood status and the willingness to stay in a relationship within the Greek cultural context. Specifically, we employed closed-ended questionnaires, which included instruments developed using AI, with a sample of 804 Greek-speaking participants. We found that participants who perceived they had a wider range of potential romantic partners reported a lower likelihood of being single. Furthermore, more perceived mate choices were associated with fewer years spent as single. However, mate choice plurality was also linked to higher choice overload, which, in turn, increased the likelihood of being single rather than in an intimate relationship. Moreover, more perceived mate choices were associated with more regrets about being in the current relationship. These regrets were linked to lower relationship satisfaction and ultimately contributed to a decreased willingness to stay in the relationship. Notably, this indirect effect was significant only for male participants.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference39 articles.

1. Kislev, E. (2019). Happy Singlehood: The Rising Acceptance and Celebration of Solo Living, University of California Press.

2. Klinenberg, E. (2012). Going Solo: The Extraordinary Rise and Surprising Appeal of Living Alone, Duckworth Overlook.

3. Reasons of singles for being single: Evidence from Brazil, China, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, India, Japan and the UK;Apostolou;Cross-Cult. Res.,2021

4. Can there ever be too many options? A meta-analytic review of choice overload;Scheibehenne;J. Consum. Res.,2010

5. Schwartz, B. (2016). The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less, Ecco Press. [2nd ed.].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3