Regeneration Membranes Loaded with Non-Antibiotic Anti-2 Microbials: A Review
Author:
Adamuz-Jiménez Ana1, Manzano-Moreno Francisco-Javier123ORCID, Vallecillo Cristina1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Dentistry, Colegio Máximo de Cartuja s/n, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain 2. Biomedical Group (BIO277), Department of Stomatology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain 3. Instituto Investigación Biosanitaria, 18012 Granada, Spain
Abstract
Both guided bone and guided tissue regeneration are techniques that require the use of barrier membranes. Contamination and infection of the surgical area is one of the most feared complications. Some current lines of research focus on functionalizing these membranes with different antimicrobial agents. The objective of this study was to carry out a review of the use and antibacterial properties of regeneration membranes doped with antimicrobials such as zinc, silver, chlorhexidine, and lauric acid. The protocol was based on PRISMA recommendations, addressing the PICO question: “Do membranes doped with non-antibiotic antimicrobials have antibacterial activity that can reduce or improve infection compared to membranes not impregnated with said antimicrobial?” Methodological quality was evaluated using the RoBDEMAT tool. A total of 329 articles were found, of which 25 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Most studies agree that zinc inhibits bacterial growth as it decreases colony-forming units, depending on the concentration used and the bacterial species studied. Silver compounds also decreased the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and presented less bacterial adhesion to the membrane. Some concentrations of chlorhexidine that possess antimicrobial activity have shown high toxicity. Finally, lauric acid shows inhibition of bacterial growth measured by the disk diffusion test, the inhibition zone being larger with higher concentrations. Antimicrobial agents such as zinc, silver, chlorhexidine, and lauric acid have effective antibacterial activity and can be used to dope regenerative membranes in order to reduce the risk of bacterial colonization.
Funder
Master of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada, Spain
Subject
Polymers and Plastics,General Chemistry
Reference59 articles.
1. Guided Bone Regeneration: Biological principle and therapeutic applications;Retzepi;Clin. Oral Implant Res.,2010 2. Dimitriou, R., Mataliotakis, G.I., Calori, G.M., and Giannoudis, P.V. (2012). The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: Current experimental and clinical evidence. BMC Med., 10. 3. Yang, Z., Wu, C., Shi, H., Luo, X., Sun, H., Wang, Q., and Zhang, D. (2022). Advances in Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10. 4. Wang, J., Wang, L., Zhou, Z., Lai, H., Xu, P., Liao, L., and Wei, J. (2016). Biodegradable Polymer Membranes Applied in Guided Bone/Tissue Regeneration: A Review. Polymers, 8. 5. Barrier membranes: More than the barrier effect?;Omar;J. Clin. Periodontol.,2019
|
|