When Women Ask, Does Curiosity Help?

Author:

Mislin Alexandra1,Tuncel Ece2,Prewitt Lucie3

Affiliation:

1. Kogod School of Business, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA

2. George Herbert Walker School of Business and Technology, Webster University, Webster Groves, MO 63119, USA

3. Institute for Policy & Social Research, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA

Abstract

This research examines the potential social benefits of displaying curiosity during a negotiation. Past research has found women who ask directly in distributive agentic settings can suffer negative social consequences and obtain worse objective outcomes compared to men. In three experiments (N = 600) using different negotiation contexts, we found men and women who approach negotiations with curiosity reap the same economic benefits of asking directly but without incurring a social cost. We also found that perceived warmth partially accounts for the positive effects of curiosity (vs. asking directly) on negotiators’ social outcomes. Finally, our results reveal women feel more comfortable conveying curiosity compared to using a direct approach in their negotiations. We discuss the implications of these findings in enhancing negotiation effectiveness for both women and men.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference68 articles.

1. Ainley, Mary D. (1998). Interest and Learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on Interest and Gender, IPN.

2. Ask and ye shall receive? How gender and status moderate negotiation success;Amanatullah;Negotiation and Conflict Management Research,2013

3. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others;Amanatullah;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2010

4. Aragão, Carolina (2023). Gender Pay Gap in US Hasn’t Changed Much in Two Decades, Pew Research Center. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/03/01/gender-pay-gap-facts/.

5. Do women ask?;Artz;Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3