Preferences for Remote and Hybrid Work: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author:

Waldrep Carolyn E.1ORCID,Fritz Marni2,Glass Jennifer1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723, USA

2. Department of Sociology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic created an opportunity for many American workers to work from home. Did the rapid and widespread adoption of remote work arrangements influence workers’ preferences? This study analyzes the early pandemic work experiences of 52 participants (20 men and 32 women) in dual-earner households with children through in-depth interviews conducted in 2021 and 2022 via Zoom. The study explores respondents’ desire for remote and hybrid work, considering job satisfaction as well as job characteristics, family structure, and household organization. Unless their jobs were poorly suited to remote work, most workers with pandemic-era remote work opportunities—and even some who had not worked remotely—wished to keep remote access in their post-pandemic work arrangements. Respondents reported enhanced job satisfaction and productivity from remote work, as a result of greater schedule control and flexibility. We found that some workers were willing to change jobs to maintain their preferred work arrangement, while others acquiesced to employers’ return-to-work policies. The study highlights the need to understand workers’ preferences in supporting flexible work arrangements and contributes to the understanding of remote work on family dynamics during the pandemic and afterwards.

Funder

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference35 articles.

1. How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings;Allen;Psychological Science in the Public Interest,2015

2. Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on Office Worker Productivity and Work Experience;Awada;Work,2021

3. Barrero, Jose Maria, Bloom, Nicholas, and Davis, Steven J. (2021). Why Working from Home Will Stick, National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper 28731.

4. Bernstein, Ethan, Blunden, Hayley, Brodsky, Andrew, Sohn, Wonbin, and Waber, Ben (2023, September 18). The Implications of Working without an Office. Available online: https://hbr.org/2020/07/the-implications-of-working-without-an-office.

5. Bloom, Nicholas (2023, October 04). Hybrid Is the Future of Work. Policy Brief, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. June. Available online: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U8NeVFONOHO0rHQq6A4hytlm3I1wio0T/view?pli=1.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3