Digital Access to Judicial Services in the Brazilian Amazon: Barriers and Potential

Author:

de Moraes Beatriz Fruet1,Lunardi Fabrício Castagna1ORCID,Correia Pedro Miguel Alves Ribeiro2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ENFAM-National School for the Training and Improvement of Magistrates, Brasília 70200-003, Brazil

2. Faculty of Law, University of Coimbra, 3004-528 Coimbra, Portugal

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of geographical barriers and the challenges and advantages presented by information and communication technologies on digital governance within the judicial branch in the Brazilian Amazon region. The primary objective is to provide diagnoses and recommendations that can inform the construction of research for the development of policies aimed at enhancing access to judicial services by riverside populations. The methodology initially employed was a comprehensive literature review on digital governance within the judiciary and access to justice for vulnerable groups in a geographical context. Subsequently, a qualitative study was conducted, employing participant observation in the riverside communities of Itapéua and Boca do Una, situated along the Jaurucu River within the Porto de Moz District in the state of Pará. The insights garnered from respondent perceptions and participant observations were synthesized to formulate five key dimensions for digital governance and access to justice within Amazonian communities: (1) one’s experience with justice, (2) access to information, (3) geographical barriers, (4) user-friendliness of technology, and (5) resources and infrastructure supporting technology use. The study concludes that there are compelling indications that tailored digital governance and technology utilization by the judiciary, adapted to regional nuances, can significantly contribute to streamlining access to judicial services.

Funder

FCT-Portugal National Agency

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference41 articles.

1. Governança judicial: Proposta de modelo teórico-metodológico;Akutsu;Revista de Administração Pública,2015

2. Barbosa, Luís Soares (2017). Digital Governance for Sustainable Development, Springer International Publishing. International Federation for Information Processing.

3. Bardin, Laurence (2020). Análise de Conteúdo, Lisboa Edições.

4. Avaliação de Desempenho de Juízes: Críticas e Propostas;Borba;Lex Humana,2023

5. Desafios metodológicos ao estudo de comunidades ribeirinhas amazônicas;Calegare;Psicologia & Sociedade,2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3