Internal Communication Quality in a Telecommuting Context: A Phenomenological Exploration of Telecommuters’ Communication Experiences

Author:

Kilson Gabriel A.1ORCID,Tavares Patrícia2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ISEG—Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Universidade de Lisboa, 1200-781 Lisbon, Portugal

2. CEEC—Research Centre for Communication and Culture, Faculty of Human Sciences, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 1649-023 Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract

Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) mediated interactions, such as audio and video calls, are part of all companies’ routines. Despite technological advances, no current ICT can perfectly mimic the unique characteristics of face-to-face interactions. As good-quality internal communication is critical to companies’ operations, the increased demand for work-from-home jobs raises relevant questions regarding employees’ capability to communicate properly. To better understand if the physical and temporal distance associated with the work-from-home represents a threat to employees’ capacity to establish clear communications, this study explores the internal communication experiences of full-time home-based telecommuters. Adopting a transcendental phenomenological strategy and based on a mix of purposeful and snowball sampling, 23 employees were interviewed online. Two additional interviews with top managers from a company where all employees work from home were also performed. Following a thematic analysis, results did not reveal a direct relationship between physical and temporal distance and the quality of internal communication. Indeed, the increased media options adopted by employees after starting to work from home contributed to improving internal communication quality. The main identified communication issues, such as information segregation, are related to how internal communications are managed, and may happen whether employees work side-by-side or physically apart.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference53 articles.

1. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings;Allen;Psychological Science in the Public Interest,2015

2. Phenomenology as a method for exploring management practice;Anosike;International Journal of Management Practice,2012

3. Antoni, Conny (2023). Virtual teams and digital collaboration. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology, 1–23.

4. The effect of telecommuting on information acquisition: Evidence from the US Patent Office;Baek;The Accounting Review,2023

5. Bloom, Nicholas, Barrero, Jose, Davis, Steven, Meyer, Brent, and Mihaylov, Emil (2023, August 28). Survey: Remote Work Isn’t Going away—And Executives Know It. Available online: https://hbr.org/2023/08/survey-remote-work-isnt-going-away-and-executives-know-it.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3