Effects of Flexibility on Digital Platform-Mediated Work in Five Ibero-American Countries

Author:

Gondim Sonia Maria Guedes12ORCID,Carneiro Laila1ORCID,Viego Valentina3ORCID,Rentería-Pérez Erico4ORCID,Cifuentes-Leiton Diana4ORCID,Moscon Daniela5ORCID,Ansoleaga Elisa6ORCID,Agulló-Tomás Esteban7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Psychology, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador 40210-730, Brazil

2. Institute of Psychology, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia 38408-100, Brazil

3. Department of Economy, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur, Conicet-Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahia Blanca 8000, Argentina

4. Faculty of Psychology, Universidad del Valle, Cali 760042, Colombia

5. School of Administration, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40110-903, Brazil

6. Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago 7630103, Chile

7. Institute of Psychology, Universidad de Oviedo, 33003 Oviedo, Spain

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize digital platform-based work arrangements in regard to their degrees of flexibility and their effects on professional achievement, balance between pros and cons, and perception of risk. A survey was conducted with platform-based workers in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Spain (e.g., transport, care and cleaning, content production, and house renting). Two thousand and forty-eight workers contacted through social networks and unions participated. Based on the factorial analysis, we propose a flexibility index covering five dimensions (contractual agreement, working hours, workplace, remuneration, and union ties). After controlling for covariates, the flexibility index was used in a regression to measure its effects on professional achievement, the balance of pros and cons, and risk perception. The digital workers with the highest flexibility scores worked in transportation and the trade of goods and services. Flexibility reduces professional achievement when the worker accesses platform jobs due to a lack of alternatives.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference35 articles.

1. Vallas, Steve P., and Kovalainen, Anne (2019). Platforms at Work: Automated Hiring Platforms and Other New Intermediaries in the Organization of Work. Work and Labor in the Digital Age (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 33), Emerald Publishing Limited.

2. Antunes, Ricardo (2018). O privilégio da servidão. O novo proletariado de serviços na era digital. [The Privilege of Servitude. The New Service Proletariat in the Digital Age], Boitempo.

3. Antunes, Ricardo (2020). Uberização, trabalho digital e indústria 4.0 [Uberization, Digital Labor and Industry 4.0], Boitempo. [1st ed.].

4. Berg, Janine, Furrer, Marianne, Harmon, Ellie, Rani, Uma, and Silberman, M. Six (2018). Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World International Labour Office, ILO. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/publications/digital-labour-platforms-and-future-work-towards-decent-work-online-world.

5. Uber happy? Work and well-being in the ‘Gig Economy’;Berger;Economic Policy,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3