Victim Care or Defendant Rights? Assessing Public Attitudes towards Special Measures Designed to Support Vulnerable Witnesses at Trial

Author:

Metson Jessica1,Willmott Dominic12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK

2. Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 53-238 Wrocław, Poland

Abstract

The introduction of ‘special measures’ within England and Wales (i.e., provisions for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses at court) marked a significant change in legal tradition and trial procedures such that victim and witness care was repositioned as a primary concern alongside the longstanding rights afforded to defendants. As public perceptions towards the legitimacy of criminal justice procedure remain a key concern among legal scholars and social scientists, this study aimed to examine individual differences in attitudes held towards the rights afforded to complainants and defendants within English courts. Adopting a cross-sectional study design, 114 UK adults were recruited to take part in an online survey. Questions centered around the importance of providing adequate witness care whilst protecting defendants’ rights to a fair trial. A new measurement tool was developed to allow these attitudes to be systematically assessed and understood, termed the Attitudes Towards Vulnerable Victims Scale (ATVVS). Results indicate that respondent age, gender, level of education, and belief in a just world are important determinants of public support for the use of special measures at trial as well as perceptions towards complainant and defendants’ rights. Taken together, findings indicate that misconceptions about vulnerable victims appear to underlie a lack of support for the use of special measures.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference114 articles.

1. How going to court affects the attitudes towards courts;Akdeniz;Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi,2020

2. Seale, C. (2012). Researching Society and Culture, Sage. [3rd ed.].

3. Police interviews with vulnerable people alleging sexual assault: Probing inconsistency and questioning conduct;Antaki;Journal of Sociolinguistics,2015

4. Perez-Leon-Acevedo, Juan Pablo, and Nicholson, Joanna (2020). Defendants and Victims in International Criminal Justice: Ensuring and Balancing Their Rights, Taylor & Francis Group.

5. Beckley, Rob (2023, March 08). Review Into the Terminology “Victim/Complainant” and Believing Victims at Time of Reporting (Rep.). Available online: https://collegeofpolicing-newsroom.prgloo.com/news/review-into-believing-victims-at-the-time-of-reporting-henriques-recommendations.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Operation Soteria Bluestone: Rethinking RASSO investigations;Journal of Criminal Psychology;2024-08-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3