Affiliation:
1. Research Centre for Communication and Culture, Catholic University of Portugal, Palma de Cima, 1649-023 Lisboa, Portugal
Abstract
Through an interdisciplinary literature review, based on empirical evidence, this research approaches different ways of interpreting silence(s) in three qualitative research methods—ethnography, focus groups and interviews—which, by their nature, are conducive to practices that resort to silence as units of meaning. The findings presented in this paper demonstrate how, in different data collection techniques, it is possible to rethink not only the whole conception of what silence is but also what silence can (or cannot) help to express. From a qualitative perspective in the social sciences and humanities, silence can in itself be a means of expression and a valid communication resource.
Reference66 articles.
1. Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants;Aguinis;Strategic Management Journal,2019
2. The Communicative Role of Silence in Akan;Agyekum;Pragmatics,2002
3. The theory of planned behavior;Ajzen;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991
4. Silence as a multi-purpose speech act in Turkish political discourse;Sahin;Procedia, Social and Behavioral Science,2011
5. Atkinson, Paul, Delamont, Sara, Coffey, Amanda, Lofland, John, and Lofland, Lyn (2007). Handbook of Ethnography, SAGE Publications Ltd.