Accounting Comparability, Conservatism, Executive Compensation-Performance, and Information Quality

Author:

Daryaei Abbas AliORCID,Fattahi YasinORCID,Askarany DavoodORCID,Askary SaeedORCID,Mollazamani MahdadORCID

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between accounting comparability, executive compensation, conditional and unconditional conservatism, and accounting information quality. The findings suggest that conditional conservatism and accounting comparability have a positive and significant impact on executive compensation. Moreover, accrual earnings management can strengthen the relationship between accounting comparability and executive compensation, whereas this is not the case with actual earnings management. Unconditional conservatism, however, does not significantly influence executive compensation. In the end, determining the correlation between earnings management and conservatism reveals that executives use conditional conservatism to perform opportunistic behaviours and gain more compensation. In light of the current results, it is expected that the assimilation of standardisation processes and their use in conjunction with existing features will enhance information quality, greater reliability of financial reports, and protect public interests.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference83 articles.

1. Ahmed, Akbar, Michael, Neel, and Irfan, Safdar Evidence on the Association between Accounting Comparability and Stock Price Efficiency. 10th Annual Lone Star Accounting Research Conference, 2017.

2. The effects of earnings management on accounting conservatism moderated by corporate governance mechanism;Al-asyari;Journal Ilmiah Wahana Akuntansi,2013

3. Peer firms in relative performance evaluation;Albuquerque;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2009

4. An investigation into the effect of surplus free cash flow, corporate governance and firm size on earnings predictability;Al-Dhamari;International Journal of Accounting and Information Management,2014

5. Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness;Ball;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2005

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3