Dextractor:Deformation Extractor Framework for Monitoring-Based Ground Radar
-
Published:2024-08-09
Issue:16
Volume:16
Page:2926
-
ISSN:2072-4292
-
Container-title:Remote Sensing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Remote Sensing
Author:
Helmy Islam12, Campbell Lachie3, Ahmadi Reza3, Awrangjeb Mohammad1ORCID, Paliwal Kuldip1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. School of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia 2. Astronomy Department, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG), Cairo 11421, Egypt 3. Geobotica Pty Ltd., Brisbane 4051, Australia
Abstract
The radio frequency (RF) data generated from a single-chip millimeter-wave (mmWave) ground-based multi-input multi-output (GB-MIMO) radar can provide a highly robust, precise measurement for deformation in harsh environments, overcoming challenges such as different lighting and weather conditions. Monitoring deformation is significant for safety factors in different applications, such as detecting and monitoring the ground stability of underground mines. However, radar images can experience different types of clutter and artifacts besides the spreading effects caused by the side lobes, resulting in the foremost challenge of suppressing clutter and monitoring deformation.In the state of the art, the introduced frameworks usually include many filters proposed for different types of noise, with commercial systems typically using an amplitude threshold. This paper proposes a framework for monitoring the deformation, where the essential process is to apply a data-driven threshold to the amplitude heatmap, detect the deformation, and eliminate noise. The proposed threshold is an iterative approach based on radar imagery statistics, and it performs well for the collected dataset. The principal advantage of our proposed framework is simplicity, reducing the burden of using different filters. We can consider the dynamic threshold based on data statistics as a data-driven machine learning tool. The results show promising performance for our method in monitoring the deformation and removing clutter compared to the benchmark method.
Reference39 articles.
1. Automatic detection of residential buildings using LIDAR data and multispectral imagery;Awrangjeb;ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens.,2010 2. Žabota, B., Berger, F., and Kobal, M. (2023). The Potential of UAV-Acquired Photogrammetric and LiDAR-Point Clouds for Obtaining Rock Dimensions as Input Parameters for Modeling Rockfall Runout Zones. Drones, 7. 3. Westoby, M., Lim, M., Hogg, M., Dunlop, L., Pound, M., Strzelecki, M., and Woodward, J. (2020). Decoding Complex Erosion Responses for the Mitigation of Coastal Rockfall Hazards Using Repeat Terrestrial LiDAR. Remote Sens., 12. 4. Maxwell, A.E., Sharma, M., Kite, J.S., Donaldson, K.A., Thompson, J.A., Bell, M.L., and Maynard, S.M. (2020). Slope Failure Prediction Using Random Forest Machine Learning and LiDAR in an Eroded Folded Mountain Belt. Remote Sens., 12. 5. Daniela, R., Ermanno, M., Antonio, P., Pasquale, R., and Marco, V. (2020). Assessment of Tuff Sea Cliff Stability Integrating Geological Surveys and Remote Sensing. Case History from Ventotene Island (Southern Italy). Remote Sens., 12.
|
|