Assessment of Renal Allograft Stiffness and Viscosity Using 2D SWE PLUS and Vi PLUS Measures—A Pilot Study

Abstract

Elastography is a useful noninvasive tool for the assessment of renal transplant recipients. 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) PLUS and viscosity plane-wave ultrasound (Vi PLUS) have emerged as novel techniques that promise to offer improved renal stiffness and viscosity measures due to improved processing algorithms. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of 50 kidney transplanted patients (16 women, 34 men; mean age of 47.5 ± 12.5; mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) estimated by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula: 52.19 ± 22.6 mL/min/1.73 m2; and a mean duration after transplant of 10.09 ± 5 years). For every patient, we obtained five valid measurements of renal stiffness (obtained from five different frames in the cortex of the renal graft), and also tissue viscosity, with a C6-1X convex transducer using the Ultra-Fast™ software available on the Aixplorer Mach 30 ultrasound system (Supersonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France). The median values of elastographic and viscosity measures have been correlated with the patients’ demographic, biological, and clinical parameters. Results: We obtained a cut-off value of renal cortical stiffness of <27.3 kiloPascal(kPa) for detection of eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 with 80% sensitivity and 85% specificity (AUC = 0.811, p < 0.0001), a cut-off value of <26.9 kPa for detection of eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 with 82.6% sensitivity and 74% specificity (AUC = 0.789, p < 0.0001), and a cut-off value of <23 kPa for detection of eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 with 88.8% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity (AUC = 0.852, p < 0.0001). We found a positive correlation coefficient between eGFR and the median measure of renal cortical stiffness (r = 0.5699, p < 0.0001), between eGFR the median measure of viscosity (r = 0.3335, p = 0.0180), between median depth of measures and renal cortical stiffness (r = −0.2795, p = 0.0493), and between median depth of measures and body mass index (BMI) (r = 0.6574, p < 0.0001). Our study showed good intra-operator agreement for both 2D SWE PLUS measures—with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.9548 and a 95% CI of 0.9315 to 0.9719—and Vi PLUS, with an ICC of 0.8323 and a 95% CI of 0.7457 to 0.8959. The multivariate regression model showed that 2D SWE PLUS values were associated with eGFR, Vi PLUS, and depth of measures. Conclusions: Assessment of renal allograft stiffness and viscosity may prove to be an effective method for identifying patients with chronic allograft injury and could prove to be a low-cost approach to provide additional diagnostic information of kidney transplanted patients.