Cross-State Validation of a Tool Supporting Implementation of Rural Kinship Navigator Programs

Author:

Routh Brianna1ORCID,McKibbin Christine2ORCID,Wihry David3,Crittenden Jennifer A.4ORCID,Foluso Ayomide5ORCID,Jain Jennifer3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Extension and the Department of Food Systems, Nutrition, and Kinesiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA

2. Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA

3. Center on Aging, University of Maine, Bangor, ME 04401, USA

4. School of Social Work, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469-5770, USA

5. Human Development and Community Health, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59715, USA

Abstract

While kinship care is prevalent and preferred over out-of-family care, there are relatively few measurement tools validated for use with this audience. The Title IV-E Clearinghouse, used to rate Families First Prevention Services such as Kinship Navigator Programs, requires valid tools. Such families face a myriad of needs in supporting children in their care. Previous research has established the significant challenges faced by rural families. Accurate assessment of these needs, particularly for rural families, is an essential component of kinship navigation services. In this study, we examined the face validity of the Family Needs Scale for use with kinship caregivers in rural programs. Methods: The evaluation teams with each respective kinship program conducted four virtual focus groups comprising kinship caregivers (n = 18) in three rural states. Participants were recruited from outside an ongoing Kinship Navigator Program Evaluation sample but had previously received program support as kinship caregivers. All states received IRB approval from their respective universities. Verbal consent was obtained at the time of the focus group. Focus groups lasted approximately 60–90 min and participants received a gift card incentive. Data were transcribed and qualitatively coded by question set and individual questions to identify phenomenological trends. Findings: Across four focus groups, we found four themes: (1) Broad agreement regarding the face validity of most assessment items; (2) Lack of clarity and shared understanding of several terms used within the tool, (3) Responses change with Ages and Stages of kinship family, and (4) Perspective considerations varying when completing the assessment. Discussion: Findings indicate that most assessment items had strong face validity, where there are a few opportunities to clarify key concepts relevant to rural kinship families and assess additional needs to understand the situational scope of the kinship experience. Overall, the needs assessment tool appears to have validity in assessing current kinship needs and outcomes within Kinship Navigator program evaluation.

Funder

Montana Department of Health and Human Services

Adoptive and Foster Families of Maine, Maine Office of Child and Family Services

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference39 articles.

1. Annie, E., and Casey Foundation (2024, July 12). Children in Kinship Care. Available online: https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/10455-children-in-kinship-care.

2. Generations United (2024, May 14). Kinship/Grandfamilies Families: Strengths and Challenges. Available online: https://www.gksnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/General-Grandfamilies-Fact-Sheet-2022-FINAL-UPDATE.pdf.

3. Annie, E. (2024, May 14). Casey Foundation. What is Kinship Care?. Available online: https://www.aecf.org/blog/what-is-kinship-care.

4. Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment;Winokur;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2014

5. Child Welfare Information Gateway (2024, September 04). Family Engagement: Partnering with Families to Improve Child Welfare Outcomes. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children’s Bureau, Available online: https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubs/f-fam-engagement/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3