Affiliation:
1. Jewish Studies Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA
Abstract
This paper examines what best explains political behavior in a deeply divided society. Despite the democratic nature of the Israeli political system, we suggest that Israel’s society is characterized by social affiliations mainly defined by social identity that include race, ethnicity, and religion and amount to tribalism. Based on the results of the 2020 election, we examined whether these social affiliations or other socioeconomic characteristics better explain voting behavior. First, we found a significant correlation between tribalism and voting behavior in Israel and socioeconomic characteristics and voting behavior in Israel. When comparing tribalism’s correlation versus other socioeconomic characteristics, we found that the correlation between tribalism and voting behavior in Israel trumps the correlation between socioeconomic characteristics and voting behavior in Israel, except for the Ashkenazi Jews. In other words, voting behavior is better explained by affiliation to the social group, that is, by kinship, race, ethnicity, and religion, than by other socioeconomic characteristics such as education level, economic status, or geographic location. This extends the idea of “in-group favoritism”.
Reference98 articles.
1. Sani, F., and Bennett, M. (2004). Developmental Aspects of Social Identity, Psychology Press.
2. Political ideology, trust, and cooperation: In-group favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US national election;Balliet;J. Confl. Resolut.,2018
3. Dimensions of work-related age stereotypes and in-group favoritism;Kleissner;Res. Aging,2020
4. In-group favoritism among native and immigrant Turkish Cypriots: Trait evaluations of in-group and out-group targets;Rustemli;J. Soc. Psychol.,2000
5. Oc, B., Moore, C., and Bashshur, M.R. (2018). When the tables are turned: The effects of the 2016 US Presidential election on in-group favoritism and out-group hostility. PLoS ONE, 13.