Primary Care Provider Receptivity to Multi-Cancer Early Detection Test Use in Cancer Screening

Author:

Chambers Christopher V.1,Leach William T.1,Davis Kaitlyn1ORCID,Myers Ronald E.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

2. Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

Abstract

Multi-cancer early detection tests (MCEDs) are blood-based tests that detect biomarkers released or induced by cancer cells. If MCED tests are shown to be safe and effective in cancer screening, they are likely to be ordered and managed in primary care. To understand primary care providers’ support for and concerns about the implementation and management of MCED testing, the research team developed a cross-sectional survey that was sent to 939 primary care providers (physicians, residents/fellows, and advanced practice providers) in a large academic health system in the greater Philadelphia area. The survey included standard items used to assess provider background characteristics and to measure provider awareness of challenges related to MCED test use (7 items), perceived competence in MCED testing (5 items), and receptivity to MCED test use in the future (4 items). A total of 351 (37.4%) primary care providers completed the survey. Among respondents, the awareness of challenges in MCED testing (mean = 3.95, sd = 0.64), perceived competence (3.67, sd = 0.85), and receptivity to MCED use in practice (mean = 3.62, 0.75) were moderately high. Multiple regression was performed to identify factors associated with receptivity to MCED testing. We found that provider number of years in practice (DATA), awareness of challenges related to MCED testing (DATA), and perceived competence in MCED test use (DATA) were positively and significantly associated with receptivity to MCED test use in practice. An exploratory factor analysis extracted two components: receptivity to MCEDs and awareness of challenges. Surprisingly, these factors had a positive correlation (r = 0.124, p = 0.024). Providers’ perceived competence in using MCED tests and providers’ experience level were significantly associated with receptivity to MCED testing. While there was strong agreement with potential challenges to implementing MCEDs, PCPs were generally receptive to using MCEDs in cancer screening. Keeping PCPs updated on the evolving knowledge of MCEDs is likely critical to building receptivity to MCED testing.

Funder

Exact Sciences Corporation

Thomas Jefferson University’s Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference33 articles.

1. (2023, April 13). FastStats—Leading Causes of Death, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm.

2. Cancer statistics, 2023;Siegel;CA Cancer J. Clin.,2023

3. (2023, April 13). Recommendation: Breast Cancer: Screening|United States Preventive Services Taskforce. Available online: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening.

4. US Preventive Services Task Force (2018). Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 320, 674–686.

5. US Preventive Services Task Force (2021). Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 325, 1965–1977.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3