Author:
Proulx Gilbert,Rodtka Dwight
Abstract
In this review, we make the point that current checking times for killing traps and snares are inadequate or nonexistent in most North American jurisdictions. We use Conibear 120 rotating-jaw traps and killing neck snares as examples of trapping devices that may fail to consistently and humanely kill furbearers. Because these killing devices are not powerful enough for the target species, the trigger systems do not properly position the animals in traps, or trappers are inexperienced and improperly set traps or snares, these killing devices become restraining devices, and animals suffer long and painful deaths. Because trappers use a variety of trigger configurations and trap sets, all killing devices, even those certified by trapper organizations or governments, should be monitored at least once every 24 h on traplines, but preferably every 12 h, because one cannot know a priori whether traps will strike animals in appropriate locations for a quick kill. However, when using trapping devices such as killing neck snares that are legal and allowed by government agencies despite being inhumane, trappers should check them every 12 h. When traplines are situated near urban areas, e.g., within 10 km, checks should be done every 12 h to release pets and non-target animals.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference38 articles.
1. Animal welfare concerns and wildlife trapping: Ethics, standards and commitments;Proulx;Trans. West. Sect. Wildl. Soc.,1989
2. Humane and efficient capture and handling methods for carnivores;Proulx,2012
3. Agreement on international humane trapping standards;Off. J. Eur. Communities,1997
4. International Agreement in the form of an Agreed Minute between the European Community and the United States of America on humane trapping standards;Off. J. Eur. Communities,1998
5. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement2
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献