Affiliation:
1. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington TW11 0LW, UK
Abstract
This paper addresses the following problem: given m potential observations to determine n parameters, m>n, what is the best choice of n observations. The problem can be formulated as finding the n×n submatrix of the complete m×n observation matrix that has maximum determinant. An algorithm by Gu and Eisenstat for a determining a strongly rank-revealing QR factorisation of a matrix can be adapted to address this latter formulation. The algorithm starts with an initial selection of n rows of the observation matrix and then performs a sequence of row interchanges, with the determinant of the current submatrix strictly increasing at each step until no further improvement can be made. The algorithm implements rank-one updating strategies, which leads to a compact and efficient algorithm. The algorithm does not necessarily determine the global optimum but provides a practical approach to designing an effective measurement strategy. In this paper, we describe how the Gu–Eisenstat algorithm can be adapted to address the problem of optimal experimental design and used with the QR algorithm with column pivoting to provide effective designs. We also describe implementations of sequential algorithms to add further measurements that optimise the information gain at each step. We illustrate performance on several metrology examples.
Funder
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, UK
Reference45 articles.
1. Atkinson, A.C., Donev, A.N., and Tobias, R.D. (2007). Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS, Oxford University Press.
2. Box, G.E.P., Hunter, W.G., and Hunter, J.S. (2005). Statistics for Experimenters: Design, Innovation and Discovery, Wiley. [2nd ed.].
3. Optimal Bayesian experimental design for linear models;Chaloner;Ann. Stat.,1984
4. Design of linear calibration experiments;Forbes;Measurement,2013
5. Goos, P. (2002). The Optimal Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments, Springer.