The Use of Honey for Cicatrization and Pain Control of Obstetric Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

Ferraz Barbosa Bárbara1,de Moraes Francisco Cezar Aquino2ORCID,Araujo Alves da Silva Bruno3ORCID,Bordignon Barbosa Camila1ORCID,Pereira da Silva Izael4ORCID,da Silva Emanuele Rocha2,Barros Jamile Cristine Marques2,Rebouças Laissa Wane Cavalcante5,dos Santos Ney Pereira Carneiro2,Fernandes Marianne Rodrigues2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of Aquino Bolivia, Santa Cruz de la Sierra 0701, SC, Bolivia

2. Oncology Research Center, Federal University of Pará, Belém 66073-005, PA, Brazil

3. Department of Medicine, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza 60714-903, CE, Brazil

4. Department of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus 69020-160, AM, Brazil

5. Gynecology and Obstetrics Service of Clinical Hospital of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14049-900, SP, Brazil

Abstract

Objective: Several studies point to antibacterial properties and beneficial effects of honey on scar tissue formation, which is a low-cost and easy-to-use option. This study aimed to compare honey versus a placebo for cicatrization and pain control of obstetric wounds, and determine if one is superior to the other, in terms of efficacy, through a meta-analysis. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Two independent investigators identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing honey and a placebo for obstetric wounds. The primary outcomes were wound healing and pain control. Results: Five randomized controlled trials and 353 patients were included, of whom, 177 (50.1%) were treated with honey. Differences were not found in the final wound healing between the honey and placebo groups (MD −0.34; 95% CI −1.13, 0.44; p = 0.39); however, there was a decrease in pain levels in the middle of the treatment (SMD −0.54; 95% CI 0.83 to 0.25, p = 0.03), reduction in the use of pain medication (ORR 0.26; 95% CI 0.08, 0.86; p = 0.03), increase in personal satisfaction in women who underwent the intervention (ORR 0.81; 95% CI 0.65, 0.98), and reduction in complications. Conclusion: According to the study results, honey treatments showed greater efficiency and provided benefits to the patients by accelerating wound healing and decreasing reported pain.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal e Nível Superior

Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas

Universidade Federal do Pará

Publisher

MDPI AG

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3