Variations in the Appearance and Interpretation of Interpersonal Eye Contact in Social Categorizations and Psychiatric Populations Worldwide: A Scoping Review with a Critical Appraisal of the Literature

Author:

Boer Jos1,Boonstra Nynke1,Kronenberg Linda2,Stekelenburg Ruben3ORCID,Sizoo Bram4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neuroscience, UMC Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands

2. Dimence Groep, Nico Bolkesteinlaan 1, 7416 SB Deventer, The Netherlands

3. Lectoraat Innovatie van Beweegzorg, University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Padualaan 101, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands

4. Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 129-B, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

Background: Eye contact is one of the most fundamental forms of interhuman communication. However, to date, there has been no comprehensive research comparing how eye contact is made and interpreted in all possible populations worldwide. This study presents a summary of the existing literature on these modalities stratified to social categorizations and psychiatric disorders. Method: A scoping review with critical appraisal of the literature according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Databases AnthroSource, Medline, CINAHL, the Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection (EBSCO) and PsychInfo were searched. Results: 7068 articles were screened for both the grey literature and reference lists, of which 385 were included, 282 for social categorizations and 103 for psychiatric disorders. In total, 603 thematic clustered outcomes of variations were included. Methodological quality was generally moderate to good. Conclusions: There is a great degree of variation in the presentation and interpretation of eye contact between and within populations. It remains unclear why specific variations occur in populations. Additionally, no gold standard for how eye contact should be used or interpreted emerged from the studies. Further research into the reason for differences in eye contact between and within populations is recommended.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference154 articles.

1. American Psychological Association (2024, June 08). Eye Contact. APA Dictionary of Psychology. Available online: https://dictionary.apa.org/.

2. Age-related declines in basic social perception: Evidence from tasks assessing eye-gaze processing;Slessor;Psychol. Aging,2008

3. Who is looking at me? The cone of gaze widens in social phobia;Gamer;Cogn. Emot.,2011

4. You Me and the World;Eilan;Analysis,2016

5. The Phenomenology of Social Encounter: The Gaze;Heron;Philos. Phenomenol. Res.,1970

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3