Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Community Health Workers in Relation to Environmental Health Hazards in the Nelson Mandela Bay-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Community Health Workers in Relation to Environmental Health Hazards in the Nelson Mandela Bay

Published:2024-03-15 Issue:3 Volume:21 Page:353
ISSN:1660-4601
Container-title:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
language:en
Short-container-title:IJERPH

Author:

Morton David G.¹,Senekane Mpinane F.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2028, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Community health workers (CHWs) cover extensive areas observing the environmental conditions in which community members live. However, current CHW training modules do not have modules focusing specifically on environmental health. CHWs appear to lack knowledge of environmental health hazards, and little is known of their attitudes and practices regarding environmental health hazards. The purpose of this study was to determine the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of CHWs in relation to environmental health hazards in the Nelson Mandela Bay (NMB). Methods: This study used a quantitative, cross-sectional research design. A sample of 110 respondents completed the questionnaire. The questionnaire was based on the literature, consisting of 36 items in four sections. Data analysis consisted of descriptive and inferential statistics. Reliability and validity were enhanced by utilizing a pre-test study. Results: There were significant differences in attitudes (t = −2.308, df = 91.107, p = 0.023) and practices (t = −2.936, df = 62.491, p = 0.005). Those trained in environmental health had a significantly lower mean attitudes score (m = 3.2365, sd = 1.113) compared to those not trained in environmental health (m = 3.694, sd = 0.894). In addition, those trained in environmental health had a significantly lower mean practice score (practiced more frequently) (m = 1.231, sd = 0.327) compared to those not trained in environmental health (m = 1.4605, sd = 0.4162). Regarding training, 62% (n = 67) of CHWs felt they needed additional training in environmental health. Conclusion: Most of the CHWs had a moderate knowledge of environmental health hazards. Furthermore, most of the CHWs had a very positive or positive attitude towards environmental health hazards. However, there is a need for CHWs to receive very specific training in environmental health. In addition, the scope of work of CHWs, as well as their role in relation to environmental health, needs to be further explored.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Link

https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/3/353/pdf

Reference50 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2023). Environmental Health, World Health Organisation. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/environmental-health#tab=tab_2.

2. Prüss-Üstün, A., Wolf, J., Corvalán, C., Bos, R., and Neira, M. (2016). Preventing Disease through Healthy Environments: A Global Assessment of the Burden of Disease from Environmental Risks, World Health Organisation. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565196.

3. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health;Landrigan;Lancet,2018

4. World Health Organization (2022). Health and Environment Scorecard. South Africa, World Health Organisation. Available online: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/country-profiles/environmental-health/environmental-health-zaf-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=8d1bf285_4&download=true.

5. National Department of Health (2023, November 18). Guideline for the Management of Domestic Indoor Air Quality a Guide for Environmental Health Practitioners in South Africa, Available online: https://www.health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/DOH-Approved-Guideline-Management-of-Domestic-Indoor-Air-Quality-Final.pdf.