Fair Funding Decisions: Consistency of the Time Horizons Used in the Calculation of Quality-Adjusted Life Years for Therapies for Very Rare Diseases by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in England

Author:

Barman-Aksözen Jasmin1ORCID,Hentschel Nicole2,Pettersson Mårten1ORCID,Schupp Eva1,Granata Francesca13ORCID,Dechant Cornelia1ORCID,Aksözen Mehmet Hakan1ORCID,Falchetto Rocco1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. International Porphyria Patient Network (IPPN), Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

2. Independent Researcher, Hegarstrasse 3, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland

3. Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, S.C Medicina ad Indirizzo Metabolico, 20122 Milano, Italy

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England uses quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to assess the cost-effectiveness of treatments. A QALY is a measure that combines the size of the clinical benefit of a treatment with the time the patient benefits from it, i.e., the time horizon. We wanted to know how consistently QALY gains are calculated at NICE. Therefore, we have analysed information on the time horizons used for the QALY calculations of the concluded evaluations conducted under the Highly Specialised Technologies programme for treatments of very rare diseases at NICE. For treatments with final guidance published by December 2023 (n = 29), a time horizon of median 97.5 years (range: 35 to 125 years) was used to calculate the QALY gains. For most QALY calculations, the accepted time horizon was longer than either the expected treatment duration or the estimated life expectancy. In contrast, for the only technology with a final negative funding decision, i.e., afamelanotide for treating the lifelong chronic disease erythropoietic protoporphyria, a time horizon that was shorter than the expected treatment duration was used. The fairness and consistency of the evaluation process of treatments for very rare diseases at NICE should be reviewed.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference38 articles.

1. Health outcomes in economic evaluation: The QALY and utilities;Whitehead;Br. Med. Bull.,2010

2. (2023, May 01). NICE 2023a. NICE Health Technology Evaluations: The Manual. London 2024. Available online: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg36/resources/nice-health-technology-evaluations-the-manual-pdf-72286779244741.

3. A QALY is a QALY–or is it?;Weinstein;J. Health Econ.,1988

4. Controversy Over Using Quality-Adjusted Life-Years In Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Systematic Literature Review;Rand;Health Aff.,2021

5. QALYs: The Math Doesn’t Work;Sawhney;J. Health Econ. Outcomes Res.,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3