Combining the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in Early Pregnancy in Danish Antenatal Care—A Qualitative Descriptive Study

Author:

Broberg Lotte12ORCID,Bendix Jane M.3ORCID,Røhder Katrine4,Løkkegaard Ellen3ORCID,Væver Mette4ORCID,Grew Julie C.1ORCID,Johnsen Helle5,Juhl Mette5,de Lichtenberg Vibeke5,Schiøtz Michaela1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg Hospital, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark

2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Slagelse Hospital, Fælledvej 14, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark

3. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital—North Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400 Hillerød, Denmark

4. Center for Early Intervention and Family Research, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, 1353 Copenhagen, Denmark

5. Department of Midwifery and Therapeutic Science, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract

Pregnant women with a history of mental disorders, neglect, or low social support are at increased risk of mental health problems. It is crucial to identify psychosocial risk factors in early pregnancy to reduce the risk of short- and long-term health consequences for mother and child. The Antenatal Risk Questionnaire has been found acceptable as a psychosocial screening tool among pregnant women in Australia, but it has not been tested in a Scandinavian context. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of pregnant women when using the Antenatal Risk Questionnaire and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as part of a model to identify psychosocial vulnerabilities in pregnancy in Denmark. We conducted individual interviews (n = 18) and used thematic analysis. We identified two main themes: (1) Feeling heard and (2) An occasion for self-reflection. Overall, the pregnant women deemed the online ANRQ/EPDS acceptable as a screening tool. The screening model provided a feeling of being heard and provided an occasion for self-reflection about mental health challenges related to pregnancy and motherhood. However, some women expressed that the screening raised concerns and fear of the consequences of answering honestly. A non-judgmental, open, emphatic, and reassuring approach by clinicians may help reduce stigma.

Funder

Liljeborg Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3