Comprehensive Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (CCQR): Reporting Guideline for Global Health Qualitative Research Methods

Author:

Sinha Priyanka1ORCID,Paudel Binita1,Mosimann Tamara2ORCID,Ahmed Hanan1,Kovane Gaotswake Patience3ORCID,Moagi Miriam4,Phuti Angel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of International Health, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, Südring 3B, 13353 Berlin, Germany

2. Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), University of Basel, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland

3. NuMIQ Research Focus Area, Faculty of Health Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa

4. Department of Nursing, University of Limpopo, MankwengTownship, Polokwane 0727, South Africa

Abstract

Globally, the demand for qualitative research has risen, driven by the health sector’s need for in-depth investigation of complex issues behind any phenomenon that may be inadequately comprehended and that other research methods cannot explore, uncover, or describe. The authors aimed to improve the accessibility and comprehensiveness of reporting guidelines for qualitative research. A comprehensive review of scientific articles was conducted on PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, and Embase, and it retrieved 1989 articles plus 13 more articles through the snowball method. After screening, 17 key articles were identified, which led to the development of Comprehensive Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research that comprises 14 categories, offering key elements in an organized table. This novel guideline complements the two widely used guidelines, Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research and Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research, by including additional aspects like objectives, existing knowledge, rationale behind methodologies, conclusions, recommendations, and reference citations. The study responds to the rising need for improved qualitative research reporting guidelines in global health.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference60 articles.

1. Developing and promoting qualitative methods in general practice research: Lessons learnt and strategies convened;Malterud;Scand. J. Public Health,2022

2. Tenny, S., Brannan, J.M., and Brannan, G.D. (2022). Qualitative Study, StatPearls—NCBI Bookshelf.

3. Qualitative methods in health care research;Renjith;Int. J. Prev. Med.,2021

4. Qualitative research in healthcare: Data analysis;Im;J. Prev. Med. Public Health,2023

5. What is qualitative in qualitative research;Aspers;Qual. Sociol.,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3