Food Banks as a “Treasure Trove”: Users’ Experiences of a Western Australian Food Relief Organization

Author:

Marshall Ned1,Bendotti Carolyn1,Charlesworth Jessica1,Mullan Barbara1ORCID,Maxwell-Smith Chloe1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Behavioural Science & Health Group, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia

Abstract

Food banks are providing crucial relief as food insecurity increases worldwide. While these services are essential for vulnerable populations, there is variability in foods available and users may experience poor nutritional quality, and an overabundance of discretionary foods, contributing to public health risks including overnutrition and obesity. Understanding how customers perceive food availability, variety, and quality is important to inform relief services and health interventions. This study reports the findings of a convergent parallel mixed-methods investigation of user experiences and perceptions of food availability, variety, and quality at a major food bank in Western Australia. Food bank customers (N = 207) at a food bank branch and mobile van locations completed a survey, with an option to complete a subsequent semi-structured interview (n = 15). Approximately 80% of the survey sample had low (48%) or very low (30%) food security, half of the sample had been using the food bank for longer than 6 months, and 77% reported the food bank as their first choice for food. Three-quarters (77%) reported financial barriers to a balanced diet in the past twelve months and described how limited availability and variety complicated shopping. Interviewees explained complex perceptions of these issues, including favouring healthy food while considering discretionary food as a “luxury” that enhanced their quality of life. Our findings suggest that food bank users experience barriers to maintaining a balanced diet, encounter variable supplies of healthy and nutritious foods, and have concerns about the impacts of frequent discretionary food consumption. These findings have implications for public health promotion.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference70 articles.

1. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO, and The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022 (2022). Repurposing Food and Agricultural Policies to Make Healthy Diets More Affordable, FAO. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/6ca1510c-9341-4d6a-b285-5f5e8743cc46/content/cc0639en.html.

2. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO, and The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2023 (2023). Urbanization, Agrifood Systems, Transformation and Healthy Diets across the Rural-Urban Continuum, FAO. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f1ee0c49-04e7-43df-9b83-6820f4f37ca9/content/cc3017en.html.

3. Global Environmental Climate Change, COVID-19, and Conflict Threaten Food Security and Nutrition;Hendriks;BMJ,2022

4. Davis, J. (2024, August 07). Charities Struggle to Survive Rising Costs, Increasing Demand, Dwindling Resources, ABC News, Available online: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-22/charities-struggle-to-survive-amid-rising-costs-crisis/102222732.

5. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (2023, July 02). Analysis of Australia’s Food Security and the COVID-19 Pandemic, Available online: https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/products/insights/australian-food-security-and-COVID-19.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3