Exploring Allied Health Models of Care for Children with Developmental Health Concerns, Delays, and Disabilities in Rural and Remote Areas: A Systematic Scoping Review

Author:

Gosse Georgia1ORCID,Kumar Saravana1ORCID,Banwell Helen1ORCID,Moran Anna2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Innovation Implementation and Clinical Translation, Allied Health and Human Performance Unit, University of South Australia, North Tce, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia

2. Department of Rural Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Graham St Shepparton, Melbourne, VIC 3630, Australia

Abstract

Background: Access to appropriate healthcare is essential for children’s healthy development. This is lacking in rural and remote areas, impacting health outcomes. Despite efforts to improve access for these communities, to date, no review has systematically mapped the literature on allied health models of care for children with developmental needs. This scoping review seeks to address this knowledge gap. Methods: Adhering to the PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, a systematic search was conducted. A total of 8 databases (from inception to May 2023) and 106 grey literature sources were searched. Two reviewers independently undertook a two-stage screening process. Data were extracted using customised tools and narratively synthesised utilising the Institute of Medicine’s quality domains. This review is registered a priori via Open Science Framework. Results: Twenty-five citations were identified within the literature. Varied models of care were reported from five mostly Western countries. Models of care identified in these areas were classified as screening services, role substitution, consultative services, or online-based services. Positive impacts on quality of healthcare were reported across all quality domains (apart from safety) with the domain of effectiveness being the most commonly reported. Conclusions: Multiple models of care are currently in operation for children with developmental needs in rural and remote areas and appear to improve the quality of care. Due to complexities within, and limitations of, the evidence base, it is unclear if one model of care is superior to another. This review provides a basis for further research to explore why some models may be more effective than others.

Funder

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and the Enterprise Research Scholarship, University of South Australia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference66 articles.

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare AIHW (2023, May 25). Rural and Remote Health, Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-remote-australians/rural-and-remote-health.

2. National Rural Health Alliance NRHA (2023). Rural Health in Australia Snapshot 2023, NRHA.

3. Addressing the health disadvantage of rural populations: How does epidemiological evidence inform rural health policies and research?;Smith;Aust. J. Rural Health,2008

4. Wakerman, J., Humphreys, J.S., Wells, R., Kuipers, P., Entwistle, P., and Jones, J. (2008). Primary health care delivery models in rural and remote Australia–a systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res., 8.

5. Access to therapy services for people with disability in rural A ustralia: A carers’ perspective;Gallego;Health Soc. Care Community,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3