Affiliation:
1. School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 14563-11155, Iran
2. School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Abstract
School trips affect different aspects, such as air pollution and urban traffic, and of personal wellbeing, such as students’ physical and mental health. The increasing concern about environmental sustainability has prompted a reevaluation of daily activities, including school transportation. While different factors that affect students’ school trips have been investigated in the literature, the effect of the built environment has been evaluated only sporadically in previous studies. To fulfil this knowledge gap, this study aims to investigate the effect of the built environment on students’ school trips by adapting and extending the well-known Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) questionnaire. The questionnaire survey was conducted with parents from 36 schools in Yazd, Iran, providing a sample of 1688 students aged 7–18 years. The items from the NEWS questionnaire were placed in nine factors by performing factor analysis. The Multinomial Logit Regression model was applied to check the predictive power of these nine factors. It was found that the variables of land use mix-diversity, land use mix-access, crime, age, gender, household income and car ownership had a significant effect on students’ school trips. The more easily students have access to different places, the less they use public services and cars compared with the active travel mode. The use of public services and cars increases with the increase in crime rate along the route to school. The findings indicate that built environment features may impact students’ shift from traditional transportation modes to active alternatives, such as walking and cycling, contributing to the attainment of broader sustainability objectives.
Reference45 articles.
1. The climate change mitigation effects of daily active travel in cities;Brand;Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ.,2021
2. Chapman, R., Keall, M., Howden-Chapman, P., Grams, M., Witten, K., Randal, E., and Woodward, A. (2018). A Cost Benefit Analysis of an Active Travel Intervention with Health and Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15.
3. Assessing the potential for carbon emissions savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-travel diary approach;Neves;Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract.,2019
4. Albalate, D., and Fageda, X. (2019). Congestion, Road Safety, and the Effectiveness of Public Policies in Urban Areas. Sustainability, 11.
5. Litman, T. (2016). Evaluating Active Transport Benefits and Costs, Victoria Transport Policy Institute.