The Emerging Role of “Failure to Rescue” as the Primary Quality Metric for Cardiovascular Surgery and Critical Care

Author:

Magouliotis Dimitrios E.1ORCID,Xanthopoulos Andrew2ORCID,Zotos Prokopis-Andreas3,Arjomandi Rad Arian4ORCID,Tatsios Evangelos3,Bareka Metaxia5ORCID,Briasoulis Alexandros6ORCID,Triposkiadis Filippos2ORCID,Skoularigis John2ORCID,Athanasiou Thanos4

Affiliation:

1. Unit of Quality Improvement, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece

2. Department of Cardiology, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece

3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece

4. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK

5. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece

6. Department of Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece

Abstract

We conducted a thorough literature review on the emerging role of failure to rescue (FTR) as a quality metric for cardiovascular surgery and critical care. For this purpose, we identified all original research studies assessing the implementation of FTR in cardiovascular surgery and critical care from 1992 to 2023. All included studies were evaluated for their quality. Although all studies defined FTR as mortality after a surgical complication, a high heterogeneity has been reported among studies regarding the included complications. There are certain factors that affect the FTR, divided into hospital- and patient-related factors. The identification of these factors allowed us to build a stepwise roadmap to reduce the FTR rate. Recently, FTR has further evolved as a metric to assess morbidity instead of mortality, while being also evaluated in the context of interventional cardiology. All these advances are further discussed in the current review, thus providing all the necessary information to surgeons, anesthesiologists, and physicians willing to implement FTR as a metric of quality in their establishment.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3