Microbiota of Peri-Implant Healthy Tissues, Peri-Implant Mucositis, and Peri-Implantitis: A Comprehensive Review
-
Published:2024-06-02
Issue:6
Volume:12
Page:1137
-
ISSN:2076-2607
-
Container-title:Microorganisms
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Microorganisms
Author:
Di Spirito Federica1ORCID, Giordano Francesco1ORCID, Di Palo Maria Pia1ORCID, D’Ambrosio Francesco1ORCID, Scognamiglio Bruno1ORCID, Sangiovanni Giuseppe1, Caggiano Mario1ORCID, Gasparro Roberta2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Via S. Allende, 84081 Baronissi, Italy 2. Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
Abstract
Understanding the microbiological profiles of peri-implant conditions is crucial for developing effective preventive and therapeutic strategies. This narrative review analyzes the microbial profiles associated with healthy peri-implant sites, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis, along with related microbiological sampling and analyses. Healthy peri-implant sites are predominantly colonized by Streptococcus, Rothia, Neisseria, and Corynebacterium species, in addition to Gram-positive cocci and facultatively anaerobic rods, forming a stable community that prevents pathogenic colonization and maintains microbial balance. In contrast, peri-implant mucositis shows increased microbial diversity, including both health-associated and pathogenic bacteria such as red and orange complex bacteria, contributing to early tissue inflammation. Peri-implantitis is characterized by even greater microbial diversity and a complex pathogenic biofilm. Predominant pathogens include Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Treponema denticola, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and unique species like Filifactor alocis and Fretibacterium fastidiosum. Additionally, less common species such as Staphylococcus and Enterobacteriaceae, contributing to disease progression through biofilm formation and increased inflammatory response, along with EBV and human cytomegalovirus with a still not defined role, and Candida albicans contribute to disease progression through biofilm formation, immune modulation, and synergistic inter-kingdom interactions. Future research should standardize diagnostic criteria, employ advanced molecular techniques, integrate microbial data with clinical factors, and highlight inter-kingdom interactions.
Reference77 articles.
1. Analysis of Ultra-Short Implants with Different Angulations: A Retrospective Case–Control Study with 2 to 9 Years of Follow-Up;Malchiodi;Clin. Oral Investig.,2024 2. Gazil, V., Bandiaky, O.N., Renard, E., Idiri, K., Struillou, X., and Soueidan, A. (2022). Current Data on Oral Peri-Implant and Periodontal Microbiota and Its Pathological Changes: A Systematic Review. Microorganisms, 10. 3. Peri-implant Health;Araujo;J. Periodontol.,2018 4. Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions: Consensus Report of Workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions;Berglundh;J. Clin. Periodontol.,2018 5. Del Amo, F.S.L., Yu, S.H., Sammartino, G., Sculean, A., Zucchelli, G., Rasperini, G., Felice, P., Pagni, G., Iorio-Siciliano, V., and Grusovin, M.G. (2020). Peri-implant Soft Tissue Management: Cairo Opinion Consensus Conference. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|