Extended Reality Head-Mounted Displays Are Likely to Pose a Significant Risk in Medical Settings While Current Classification Remains as Non-Critical

Author:

Goldsworthy Adrian12ORCID,Olsen Matthew2ORCID,Koh Andy3ORCID,Demaneuf Thibaut4,Singh Gobinddeep2,Almheiri Reem5,Chapman Brendan1ORCID,Almazrouei Shaima6,Ghemrawi Rose78ORCID,Senok Abiola910ORCID,McKirdy Simon1ORCID,Alghafri Rashed18,Tajouri Lotti125

Affiliation:

1. Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA 6150, Australia

2. Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia

3. Department of Forensic Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka 589-8511, Japan

4. The Pacific Community (SPC), Noumea 98848, New Caledonia

5. Dubai Police Scientists Council, Dubai Police, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

6. International Centre for Forensic Sciences, Dubai Police, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

7. Health and Biomedical Research Center, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

8. AAU Health and Biomedical Research Center, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

9. College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

10. School of Dentistry, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK

Abstract

Extended reality (XR) devices, including virtual and augmented reality head-mounted displays (HMDs), are increasingly utilised within healthcare to provide clinical interventions and education. Currently, XR devices are utilised to assist in reducing pain and improving psychological outcomes for immunocompromised patients in intensive care units, palliative care environments and surgical theatres. However, there is a paucity of research on the risks of infection from such devices in healthcare settings. Identify existing literature providing insights into the infection control risk XR HMDs pose within healthcare facilities and the efficacy of current infection control and cleaning procedures. Three databases (PubMed, Embase and CINAHL) in addition to Google Scholar were systematically searched. A total of seven studies were identified for this review. Microorganisms, including pathogenic bacteria (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), were found to be present on XR HMDs. Published cleaning and infection control protocols designed to disinfect XR HMDs and protect users were heterogeneous in nature. Current cleaning protocols displayed varying levels of efficacy with microbial load affected by multiple factors, including time in use, number of users and XR HMD design features. In healthcare settings, fitting XR HMDs harbouring microorganisms near biological and mucosal entry points presents an infection control risk. An urgent revision of the Spaulding classification is required to ensure flexibility that allows for these devices to be reclassified from ‘Non-critical’ to ‘Semi-Critical’ depending on the healthcare setting and patient population (surgery, immunocompromised, burns, etc.). This review identified evidence supporting the presence of microorganisms on XR HMDs. Due to the potential for HMDs to contact mucosal entry points, devices must be re-considered within the Spaulding classification as ‘Semi-critical’. The existence of microbial contaminated XR HMDs in high-risk medical settings such as operating wards, intensive care units, emergency departments, labour and delivery wards and clinical areas with immunosuppressed patients requires urgent attention. Public health authorities have a duty of care to develop revised guidelines or new recommendations to ensure efficient sanitation of such devices.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference40 articles.

1. Fortune Business Insights (2022). Virtual Reality (VR in Healthcare Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis, by Component (Hardware, Software, and Content), by Application (Pain Management, Education & Training, Surgery, Paitient Care Management, Rehabilitation & Therapy Procedures, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and Regional Forecast, 2023–2020, Fortune Business Insights.

2. Perkins Coie LLP (2020). Augmented and Virtual Reality Survey Report, Perkins Coie LLP.

3. Barcali, E., Iadanza, E., Manetti, L., Francia, P., Nardi, C., and Bocchi, L. (2022). Augmented reality in surgery: A scoping review. Appl. Sci., 12.

4. Augmented reality in vascular and endovascular surgery: Scoping review;Eves;JMIR Serious Games,2022

5. The impact of extended reality on surgery: A scoping review;Zhang;Int. Orthop.,2023

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3