Strain-Dependent Adhesion Variations of Shouchella clausii Isolated from Healthy Human Volunteers: A Study on Cell Surface Properties and Potential Probiotic Benefits
-
Published:2024-08-27
Issue:9
Volume:12
Page:1771
-
ISSN:2076-2607
-
Container-title:Microorganisms
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Microorganisms
Author:
Dhakephalkar Tanisha1, Pisu Vaidehi23, Margale Prajakta2, Chandras Siddhi23, Shetty Deepa2, Wagh Shilpa1, Dagar Sumit Singh23, Kapse Neelam2ORCID, Dhakephalkar Prashant K.23
Affiliation:
1. Hi Tech BioSciences India Ltd., Research & Development Centre, Plot No. 6 and 8, Ambadvet Industrial Estate, PO Paud, Pune 412108, Maharashtra, India 2. Bioenergy Group, MACS-Agharkar Research Institute, G.G. Agarkar Road, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India 3. Department of Microbiology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Ganeshkhind Rd., Aundh, Pune 411007, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
The probiotic potential of Shouchella clausii is widely recognized, but little is known about its adhesive properties. Hence, this study aims to investigate the adhesion potential and cell surface properties of four human-origin S. clausii strains (B619/R, B603/Nb, B106, and B637/Nm). We evaluated epithelial adhesion, Extracellular Matrix (ECM) binding, aggregation ability, and cell surface hydrophobicity and used genome analysis for validation. Our results demonstrate that adhesion capability is a strain-specific attribute, with significant variations observed among the four strains. B619/R, B603/Nb, and B106 displayed stronger adhesion properties than B637/Nm. Supplementary adhesion assays showed that B637/Nm displayed high hydrophobicity, significant auto-aggregation, and significant mucin-binding abilities. Conversely, B619/R, B603/Nb, and B106 had mildly hydrophobic surfaces and low aggregation abilities. Genome annotation revealed the presence of various adhesion proteins in four strains. Notably, the reduced adhesion potential of B637/Nm was supported by the absence of the cell wall surface anchor family protein (LPxTG motif), which is crucial for interactions with intestinal epithelial cells or mucus components. Further, docking studies provided insights into the interaction of adhesion proteins with gut mucins. These findings contribute to a better understanding of how S. clausii strains interact with the gut environment, facilitating the development of probiotic formulations tailored for improved gut health and well-being.
Funder
Hi Tech BioSciences India Ltd., Research & Development Centre
Reference94 articles.
1. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic;Hill;Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.,2014 2. Binda, S., Hill, C., Johansen, E., Obis, D., Pot, B., Sanders, M.E., Tremblay, A., and Ouwehand, A.C. (2020). Criteria to qualify microorganisms as “probiotic” in foods and dietary supplements. Front. Microbiol., 11. 3. Fijan, S., Frauwallner, A., Langerholc, T., Krebs, B., ter Haar, J.A., Heschl, A., Mičetić Turk, D., and Rogelj, I. (2019). Efficacy of using probiotics with antagonistic activity against pathogens of wound infections: An integrative review of literature. Biomed. Res. Int., 2019. 4. Layer by layer encapsulation of probiotics for delivery to the microbiome;Anselmo;Adv. Mater.,2016 5. Importance of the gastrointestinal life cycle of Bacillus for probiotic functionality;Bernardeau;J. Food Sci. Technol.,2017
|
|