Breaking the Cycle: A Yeast Mannan-Rich Fraction Beneficially Modulates Egg Quality and the Antimicrobial Resistome Associated with Layer Hen Caecal Microbiomes under Commercial Conditions
-
Published:2024-07-30
Issue:8
Volume:12
Page:1562
-
ISSN:2076-2607
-
Container-title:Microorganisms
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Microorganisms
Author:
Corrigan Aoife1ORCID, McCooey Paula1, Taylor-Pickard Jules2, Stockdale Stephen34, Murphy Richard1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Alltech Bioscience Centre, A86 X006 Dunboyne, Co. Meath, Ireland 2. Alltech (UK) Ltd., Stamford PE9 1TZ, UK 3. Novogene (UK) Company Ltd., 25 Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge CB4 0FW, UK 4. BioFigR, Ballyvoloon, P24 N524 Cobh, Cork, Ireland
Abstract
Antibiotics and antibiotic growth promoters have been extensively employed in poultry farming to enhance growth performance, maintain bird health, improve nutrient uptake efficiency, and mitigate enteric diseases at both sub-therapeutic and therapeutic doses. However, the extensive use of antimicrobials in poultry farming has led to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in microbial reservoirs, representing a significant global public health concern. In response, non-antibiotic dietary interventions, such as yeast mannan-rich fraction (MRF), have emerged as a promising alternative to modulate the gut microbiota and combat the AMR crisis. This study investigated whether a yeast mannan-rich fraction containing feed supplement impacted the performance of laying hens, their microbiomes, and the associated carriage of antimicrobial resistance genes under commercial conditions. High-throughput DNA sequencing was utilised to profile the bacterial community and assess changes in the antibiotic resistance genomes detected in the metagenome, the “resistome”, in response to MRF supplementation. It was found that supplementation favourably influenced laying hen performance and microbial composition. Notably, there was a compositional shift in the MRF supplemented group associated with a lower relative abundance of pathobionts, e.g., Escherichia, Brachyspira and Trueperella, and their AMR-encoded genes, relative to beneficial microbes. Overall, the findings further demonstrate the ability of prebiotics to improve laying hen performance through changes associated with their microbiome and resistome.
Reference73 articles.
1. Wickramasuriya, S.S., Park, I., Lee, K., Lee, Y., Kim, W.H., Nam, H., and Lillehoj, H.S. (2022). Role of Physiology, Immunity, Microbiota, and Infectious Diseases in the Gut Health of Poultry. Vaccines, 10. 2. Aruwa, C.E., Pillay, C., Nyaga, M.M., and Sabiu, S. (2021). Poultry gut health–microbiome functions, environmental impacts, microbiome engineering and advancements in characterization technologies. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 12. 3. Diaz Carrasco, J.M., Casanova, N.A., and Fernández Miyakawa, M.E. (2019). Microbiota, Gut Health and Chicken Productivity: What Is the Connection?. Microorganisms, 7. 4. Abreu, R., Semedo-Lemsaddek, T., Cunha, E., Tavares, L., and Oliveira, M. (2023). Antimicrobial Drug Resistance in Poultry Production: Current Status and Innovative Strategies for Bacterial Control. Microorganisms, 11. 5. Koorakula, R., Schiavinato, M., Ghanbari, M., Wegl, G., Grabner, N., Koestelbauer, A., Klose, V., Dohm, J.C., and Domig, K.J. (2022). Metatranscriptomic Analysis of the Chicken Gut Resistome Response to In-Feed Antibiotics and Natural Feed Additives. Front. Microbiol., 13.
|
|