Insights into Effects of Combined Capric and Lauric Acid on Rumen Bacterial Composition
-
Published:2024-05-27
Issue:6
Volume:12
Page:1085
-
ISSN:2076-2607
-
Container-title:Microorganisms
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Microorganisms
Author:
Vadroňová Mariana12ORCID, Šťovíček Adam1, Výborná Alena2, Tyrolová Yvona2ORCID, Tichá Denisa12, Joch Miroslav12
Affiliation:
1. Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic 2. Department of Nutrition and Feeding of Farm Animals, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 00 Prague, Czech Republic
Abstract
This study used next-generation sequencing to assess the impact of combined capric acid (C10) and lauric acid (C12) on the ruminal bacterial composition. Eight Holstein cows were randomly assigned to two groups using a cross-over design. The cows were fed two silage-based diets with the addition of either 100 g of stearic acid per cow per day (control), or 50 g of capric acid and 50 g of lauric acid per cow per day (C10 + C12). On day 18, 250 mL of rumen fluid was collected from each cow, and DNA was isolated, amplified, and sequenced. Treatment did not alter bacterial diversity indices, the relative abundance of archaea, nor the fiber-degrading microorganisms, except for a decrease in Fibrobacter (from 2.9% to 0.7%; p = 0.04). The relative abundance of Prevotellaceae decreased (from 39.9% to 29.6%; p = 0.009), which is notable because some members help to efficiently utilize ammonia by releasing it slowly into the rumen. Furthermore, the relative abundance of Clostridia increased (from 28.4% to 41.5%; p = 0.008), which may have aided the increased ammonia–nitrogen levels in the rumen, as this class contains hyperammonia-producing members. Our study reveals alterations in bacterial abundances with implications for rumen ammonia levels, offering insights into potential strategies for modulating rumen fermentation processes and methane production in ruminant livestock.
Funder
Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic
Reference43 articles.
1. Batch Culture Analysis to Identify Potent Organic Acids for Suppressing Ruminal Methane Production;Yamada;Anim. Sci. J.,2023 2. Gruninger, R.J., Zhang, X.M., Smith, M.L., Kung, L., Vyas, D., McGinn, S.M., Kindermann, M., Wang, M., Tan, Z.L., and Beauchemin, K.A. (2022). Application of 3-Nitrooxypropanol and Canola Oil to Mitigate Enteric Methane Emissions of Beef Cattle Results in Distinctly Different Effects on the Rumen Microbial Community. Anim. Microbiome, 4. 3. Choi, Y., Lee, S.J., Kim, H.S., Eom, J.S., Jo, S.U., Guan, L.L., Seo, J., Kim, H., Lee, S.S., and Lee, S.S. (2021). Effects of Seaweed Extracts on in Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristics, Methane Production, and Microbial Abundance. Sci. Rep., 11. 4. Sikiru, A., Michael, A.O., John, M.O., Egena, S.S.A., Oleforuh-Okoleh, V.U., Ambali, M.I., and Muhammad, I.R. (2024). Methane Emissions in Cattle Production: Biology, Measurement and Mitigation Strategies in Smallholder Farmer Systems. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 5. Tapio, I., Snelling, T.J., Strozzi, F., and Wallace, R.J. (2017). The Ruminal Microbiome Associated with Methane Emissions from Ruminant Livestock. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 8.
|
|