Progress and Limitations in the Satellite-Based Estimate of Burnt Areas

Author:

Laneve Giovanni1ORCID,Di Fonzo Marco2,Pampanoni Valerio1ORCID,Bueno Morles Ramon1

Affiliation:

1. Scuola di Ingegneria Aerospaziale, Sapienza University of Rome, 00138 Rome, Italy

2. Comando Unità Forestali Ambientali e Agroalimentari Carabinieri, 00184 Rome, Italy

Abstract

The detection of burnt areas from satellite imagery is one of the most straightforward and useful applications of satellite remote sensing. In general, the approach relies on a change detection analysis applied on pre- and post-event images. This change detection analysis usually is carried out by comparing the values of specific spectral indices such as: NBR (normalised burn ratio), BAI (burn area index), MIRBI (mid-infrared burn index). However, some potential sources of error arise, particularly when near-real-time automated approaches are adopted. An automated approach is mandatory when the burnt area monitoring should operate systematically on a given area of large size (country). Potential sources of errors include but are not limited to clouds on the pre- or post-event images, clouds or topographic shadows, agricultural practices, image pixel size, level of damage, etc. Some authors have already noted differences between global databases of burnt areas based on satellite images. Sources of errors could be related to the spatial resolution of the images used, the land-cover mask adopted to avoid false alarms, and the quality of the cloud and shadow masks. This paper aims to compare different burnt areas datasets (EFFIS, ESACCI, Copernicus, FIRMS, etc.) with the objective to analyse their differences. The comparison is restricted to the Italian territory. Furthermore, the paper aims to identify the degree of approximation of these satellite-based datasets by relying on ground survey data as ground truth. To do so, ground survey data provided by CUFA (Comando Unità Forestali, Ambientali e Agroalimentari Carabinieri) and CFVA (Corpo Forestale e Vigilanza Ambientale Sardegna) were used. The results confirm the existence of significant differences between the datasets. The subsequent comparison with the ground surveys, which was conducted while also taking into account their own approximations, allowed us to identify the accuracy of the satellite-based datasets.

Funder

European Commission

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference47 articles.

1. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: A brief review and suggested usage;Keeley;Int. J. Wildland Fire,2009

2. Lutes, D.C., Keane, R.E., Caratti, J.F., Key, C.H., Benson, N.C., and Gangi, L.J. (2005). FIREMON: Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

3. GeoCBI: A Modified Version of the Composite Burn Index for the Initial Assessment of the Short-Term Burn Severity from Remotely Sensed Data;Chuvieco;Remote Sens. Environ.,2009

4. Evaluation and comparison of Landsat 8, Sentinel-2 and Deimos-1 remote sensing indices for assessing burn severity in Mediterranean fire prone ecosystems;Quintano;Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs. Geoinf.,2019

5. Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016;Randerson;Earth Syst. Sci. Data,2017

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3