Affiliation:
1. MNR Key Laboratory of Metallogeny and Mineral Assessment, Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
2. School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
3. Inner Mongolia Yulong Mining Co., Ltd., Xilinhot 026200, China
4. College of Earth Sciences, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 050031, China
Abstract
The superlarge Huaaobaote Ag–Pb–Zn deposit is located on the western slope of the southern Great Xing’an Range (SGXR). The deposit includes four ore blocks, namely, ore blocks I, II, III, and V. Except for the no. I orebody of ore block I, which is hosted in the contact zone between the Carboniferous serpentinized harzburgite and the Permian siltstone, the other orebodies all occur as veins controlled by faults. The mineralization process at the deposit can be divided into four stages: cassiterite–arsenopyrite–pyrite–quartz stage (stage I), cassiterite–chalcopyrite–pyrite–freibergite–arsenopyrite–pyrrhotite–quartz stage (stage II), sphalerite–galena–jamesonite–stibnite–freibergite–silver mineral–quartz–calcite–chlorite stage (stage III), and argentite–pyrargyrite–pyrite–quartz–calcite (stage IV). Cassiterite U–Pb dating of the Huaaobaote deposit yielded ages of 136.3–134.3 Ma, indicating that the deposit formed in the Early Cretaceous period. Two types of fluid inclusions (FIs), including liquid-rich and gas-rich FIs, have been distinguished in the quartz vein and sphalerite. The homogenization temperature during the four stages gradually decreases, with temperatures of 302–340 °C for stage I, 267–304 °C for stage II, 186–273 °C for stage III, and 166–199 °C for stage IV, respectively. The salinity (wt% NaCl eqv.) at stages I, II, III, and IV is 3.7–6.6, 0.2–4.5, 0.2–5.0, and 0.4–1.6, respectively, indicating that the ore-forming fluid is characterized by low salinity. The δ18Owater and δD values of the ore-forming fluid range from −11.9‰ to 7.9‰ and −168‰ to −76‰, respectively, indicating that the ore-forming fluid was dominantly derived from a mixture of magmatic and meteoric water. The calculated δ34SH2S values range from −3.6‰ to 1.2‰, indicating that the sulfur mainly came from granitic magma. The 206Pb/204Pb, 207Pb/204Pb, and 208Pb/204Pb ratios of sulfides are in the ranges of 18.195–18.317, 15.509–15.667, and 37.965–38.475, respectively, implying that the ore-forming material was mainly derived from felsic magma that may be formed by the partial melting of orogenic materials. Fluid mixing, cooling, and immiscibility were the three primary mechanisms for mineral precipitation in the Huaaobaote deposit.
Funder
Scientific Research Project of Inner Mongolia Yulong Mining Co., Ltd
Geological Survey Project of Copper and Gold Mineral Resources in Key Metallogenic Zones
Youth Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Subject
Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference102 articles.
1. Tin–polymetallic mineralization in the southern part of the Da Hinggan Mountains, China;Wang;Resour. Geol.,2001
2. Late Mesozoic metallogeny and intracontinental magmatism, southern Great Xing’an Range, northeastern China;Ouyang;Gondwana Res.,2015
3. Poly-metal mineralization and exploration potential in southern segment of Da Hinggan Mountains;Zeng;J. Jilin Univ. Earth Sci. Ed.,2016
4. Metallogeny of Xing–Meng Orogenic Belt and some related problems;Jiang;Miner. Depos.,2018
5. Metallogenic patterns and ore deposit model of the tin–polymetallic deposits in the southern segment of Great Xing’an Range;Zhou;Earth Sci. Front.,2022