Numerical Simulation Study of Huff-n-Puff Hydrocarbon Gas Injection Parameters for Enhanced Shale Oil Recovery
Author:
Garipova Alsu1, Mukhina Elena1ORCID, Cheremisin Alexander1, Spivakova Margarita1, Kasyanenko Anton2, Cheremisin Alexey1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Center for Petroleum Science and Engineering, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 121205 Moscow, Russia 2. Gazpromneft—Technological Partnerships, 190000 St. Petersburg, Russia
Abstract
Gas injection has already proven to be an efficient shale oil recovery method successfully tested all around the world. However, gas-enhanced oil recovery methods have never been implemented or tested for the greatest Siberian shale oil formation yet. This article proposes numerical simulation of a hydrocarbon gas injection process into a horizontal well with multiple hydraulic fractures perforating Bazhenov shale oil formation in Western Siberia characterized by ultra-low permeability. A complex field-scale numerical study of gas injection for such a formation has never been performed before and is presented for the first time in our work. The hydrodynamic compositional simulation was performed utilizing a commercial simulator. A sensitivity study for different operating parameters including cycle times, bottom-hole pressures for the production and injection period, and injected gas composition was performed after the model was history matched with the available production data. Some uncertain reservoir properties such as relative permeability curves were also sensitized upon. Two different ways of accounting for multiple hydraulic fractures in the simulation model are presented and the simulation results from both models are compared and discussed. Eventually, huff-n-puff injection of a hydrocarbon gas resulted in a 34–117% increase in oil recovery depending on the fracture model.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference28 articles.
1. McGlade, C., and Sondak, G. (2020, January 05). Whatever Happened to Enhanced Oil Recovery. Available online: https://www.iea.org/commentaries/whatever-happened-to-enhanced-oil-recovery. 2. Alfarge, D., Wei, M., and Bai, B. (2017, January 23–27). IOR Methods in Unconventional Reservoirs of North America: Comprehensive Review. Proceedings of the SPE Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, CA, USA. SPE-185640-MS. 3. Allharthy, N., Teklu, T., Kazemi, N., Graves, R., Hawthorne, S., Braunberger, J., and Kurtoglu, B. (2015, January 28–30). Enhanced Oil Recovery in Liquid-Rich Shale Reservoirs: Laboratory to Field. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, USA. SPE-175034. 4. Cipolla, C.L., Warpinski, N.R., Mayerhofer, M.J., and Lolon, E.P. (2010, January 21–24). The Relationship between Fracture Complexity, Reservoir Properties, and Fracture-Treatment Design. Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conferene and Exhibition, Denver, CO, USA. 5. Breyer, J. (2016). The Eagle Ford Shale: A Renaissance in U.S. Oil Production, American Association of Petroleum Geologists.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|