The Reliability and Validity of the Polish Version of the Schema Mode Inventory (SMI)

Author:

Grażka Anna1ORCID,Królewiak Klara2,Sójta Klaudia1,Strzelecki Dominik1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Affective and Psychotic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, 92-216 Lodz, Poland

2. Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University, 03-815 Warszawa, Poland

Abstract

(1) Background: Schema therapy and working with schema modes is increasingly popular. Since there is no validated tool to measure schema modes in Poland, in this study, we present an assessment of the psychometric properties of the Polish version the Short Schema Mode Inventory (SMI) adaptation. (2) Methods: First, the original version of the scale was translated. Subsequently, a validity and reliability study was conducted on a sample of 240 patients and 400 non-patients. In particular, the factor structure of the inventory was checked, internal reliability and intercorrelations between subscales were tested, differences between the clinical and non-clinical groups in terms of the severity of each factor were examined, and construct validity was assessed by comparing the association of results with external variables. (3) Results: The results did not conclusively confirm the 14-factor structure postulated in the original scale. Nevertheless, the relatively best fit indices were obtained for such a model. The internal reliability for the 14 subscales ranged from 0.74 to 0.95 (McDonald’s omega). Correlations between subscales demonstrated values from 0.03 to 0.72. The existence of differences between the clinical and non-clinical groups and the construct validity were confirmed. (4) Conclusions: The psychometric evaluation performed is mostly similar to the results obtained for other adaptations, and the results justify the inventory being used for research and clinical purposes when knowledge of its limitations is included.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Young, J.E. (1990). Cognitive Therapy for Personality Disorders: A Schema-Focused Approach, Professional Resource Exchange.

2. Young, J.E., Klosko, J.S., and Weishaar, M.E. (2006). Schema Therapy: A Practitioner’s Guide, Guilford Press.

3. The Efficacy of Schema Therapy for Personality Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis;Zhang;Nord. J. Psychiatry,2023

4. Does Schema Therapy Change Schemas and Symptoms? A Systematic Review across Mental Health Disorders;Taylor;Psychol. Psychother. Theory Res. Pract.,2017

5. A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Schema Therapy;Masley;Cogn. Behav. Ther.,2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3