Analysis of Cumulative Antibiogram Reports in Search for Optimal Empirical Urinary Tract Infection Treatment at the Central Teaching Hospital of the Medical University of Lodz, Poland: Results of a 3-Year Surveillance

Abstract

Urinary tract infections are among the most common bacterial infections, accounting for about two-fifths of all healthcare-associated infections. Appropriate antimicrobial therapy is crucial, e.g., to avoid prolonged hospitalization and limit antimicrobial resistance spread. This study was performed to analyze the microbiological profiles of urinary tract infections in the Central Teaching Hospital in Lodz, Poland, and develop local empirical therapy guidelines. This study was a 3-year retrospective surveillance of the cumulative antibiograms from urine cultures. The procedures were based on the current EUCAST and CLSI guidelines. In 2020–2022, a total of 4656 urine cultures were performed, of which 1134 were positive. The most common bacterial isolates were Escherichia coli, followed by Klebsiella spp. and Enterococcus spp. High levels of susceptibility (>90%) have been observed for carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, amikacin, and nitrofurantoin. Development of the appropriate empirical antimicrobial is a challenging task with persistently high levels of resistance to commonly used antimicrobials. Eventually, we separated the uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections in local guidelines and recommended nitrofurantoin and amikacin, respectively, in empiric therapy. The clinicians should make a decision based on the presented symptoms and then—with the urine culture result—correct or continue the therapy.