Comparative Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Methods with and without Sample Multiplexing

Author:

Xie Yi1,Chen Huimei1,Chellamuthu Vasuki Ranjani2,Lajam Ahmad bin Mohamed2ORCID,Albani Salvatore2,Low Andrea Hsiu Ling34ORCID,Petretto Enrico15ORCID,Behmoaras Jacques16

Affiliation:

1. Programme in Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders and Centre for Computational Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore

2. Translational Immunology Institute, SingHealth/Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, Academia, Singapore 169856, Singapore

3. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore 169856, Singapore

4. SingHealth Duke-NUS Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore

5. Institute for Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, School of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 210009, China

6. Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful technique for investigating biological heterogeneity at the single-cell level in human systems and model organisms. Recent advances in scRNA-seq have enabled the pooling of cells from multiple samples into single libraries, thereby increasing sample throughput while reducing technical batch effects, library preparation time, and the overall cost. However, a comparative analysis of scRNA-seq methods with and without sample multiplexing is lacking. In this study, we benchmarked methods from two representative platforms: Parse Biosciences (Parse; with sample multiplexing) and 10x Genomics (10x; without sample multiplexing). By using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from two healthy individuals, we demonstrate that demultiplexed scRNA-seq data obtained from Parse showed similar cell type frequencies compared to 10x data where samples were not multiplexed. Despite relatively lower cell capture affecting library preparation, Parse can detect rare cell types (e.g., plasmablasts and dendritic cells) which is likely due to its relatively higher sensitivity in gene detection. Moreover, a comparative analysis of transcript quantification between the two platforms revealed platform-specific distributions of gene length and GC content. These results offer guidance for researchers in designing high-throughput scRNA-seq studies.

Funder

NMRC Clinician Scientist Award

NMRC

Duke-NUS

SingHealth AMC core funding

Singapore Ministry of Health’s NMRC

Ministry of Education

National Research Foundation Singapore

Duke-NUS Medical School

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3