Immunogenicity and Safety of Chikungunya Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Author:
Rosso Annalisa1ORCID, Flacco Maria Elena1ORCID, Cioni Giovanni1ORCID, Tiseo Marco1, Imperiali Gianmarco1, Bianconi Alessandro2ORCID, Fiore Matteo2ORCID, Calò Giovanna Letizia1, Orazi Vittorio1ORCID, Troia Anastasia1ORCID, Manzoli Lamberto2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. School of Public Health, Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Fossato di Mortara 44, 44121 Ferrara, Italy 2. School of Public Health, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Abstract
Several vaccines against chikungunya fever have been developed and tested, and one has been recently licensed. We performed a meta-analysis to estimate the immunogenicity and safety of all chikungunya vaccines that have been progressed to clinical trial evaluation (VLA1553; mRNA-1388/VAL-181388; PXVX0317/VRC-CHKVLP059-00-VP; ChAdOx1 Chik; MV-CHIK). We included trials retrieved from MedLine, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The outcomes were the rates of seroconversion/seroresponse and serious adverse events (SAEs) after the primary immunization course. We retrieved a total of 14 datasets, including >4000 participants. All candidate chikungunya vaccines were able to elicit an immunogenic response in ≥96% of vaccinated subjects, regardless of the vaccination schedule and platform used, and the seroconversion/seroresponse rates remained high 6 to 12 months after vaccination for most vaccines. Four of the five candidate vaccines showed a good overall safety profile (no data were available for ChAdOx1 Chik), with no significant increase in the risk of SAEs among the vaccinated, and a low absolute risk of product-related SAEs. Overall, the present findings support the potential use of the candidate vaccines for the prevention of chikungunya and the current indication for use in adult travelers to endemic regions of the licensed VLA 1553 vaccine. In order to extend chikungunya vaccination to a wider audience, further studies are needed on individuals from endemic countries and frail populations.
Reference38 articles.
1. Global expansion of chikungunya virus: Mapping the 64-year history;Wahid;Int. J. Infect. Dis.,2017 2. Rama, K., de Roo, A.M., Louwsma, T., Hofstra, H.S., Amaral, G.S.G.D., Vondeling, G.T., Postma, M.J., and Freriks, R.D. (2024). Clinical outcomes of chikungunya: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis., 18. 3. Chikungunya chronic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Paixao;Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.,2018 4. Bettis, A.A., L’Azou Jackson, M., Yoon, I.K., Breugelmans, J.G., Goios, A., Gubler, D.J., and Powers, A.M. (2022). The global epidemiology of chikungunya from 1999 to 2020: A systematic literature review to inform the development and introduction of vaccines. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis., 16. 5. Ryan, S.J., Carlson, C.J., Mordecai, E.A., and Johnson, L.R. (2019). Global expansion and redistribution of Aedes-borne virus transmission risk with climate change. PLoS Neglected Trop. Dis., 13.
|
|