Increasing Influenza Vaccination in Primary Healthcare Workers Using Solidary Incentives: Analysis of Efficacy and Costs

Author:

Bengoa Terrero Christian1ORCID,Bas Villalobos Marian1,Pastor Rodríguez-Moñino Ana2,Lasheras Carbajo María Dolores3,Pérez-Villacastín Julián1,Fernández Pérez Cristina4,García Torrent María Jesús5ORCID,Sánchez-del-Hoyo Rafael6,García Lledó Alberto7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, 28040 Madrid, Spain

2. Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, 28035 Madrid, Spain

3. Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Sanidad de la Comunidad de Madrid, 28009 Madrid, Spain

4. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico, Universitario de Santiago, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain

5. Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

6. Unidad de Apoyo Metodológico a la Investigación, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, 28040 Madrid, Spain

7. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, Alcalá de Henares, 28805 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Introduction: Influenza vaccination campaigns have difficulty in reaching the 75% uptake in healthcare workers (HCWs) that public health organizations target. This study runs a campaign across 42 primary care centers (PCCs) where for every HCW vaccinated against influenza, a polio vaccine is donated through UNICEF for children in developing nations. It also analyses the efficacy and cost of the campaign. Method: This observational prospective non-randomized cohort study was conducted across 262 PCCs and 15.812 HCWs. A total of 42 PCCs were delivered the full campaign, 114 were used as the control group, and 106 were excluded. The vaccine uptake in HCWs within each of those PCCs was registered. The cost analysis assumes that campaign costs remain stable year to year, and the only added cost would be the polio vaccines (0.59€). Results: We found statistically significant differences between both groups. A total of 1423 (59.02%) HCWs got vaccinated in the intervention group and 3768 (55.76%) in the control group OR 1.14, CI 95% (1.04–1.26). In this scenario, each additional HCW vaccinated in the intervention group costs 10.67€. Assuming all 262 PCCs had joined the campaign and reached 59.02% uptake, the cost of running this incentive would have been 5506€. The potential cost of increasing uptake in HCWs by 1% across all PCC (n = 8816) would be 1683€, and across all healthcare providers, 8862€ (n = 83.226). Conclusions: This study reveals that influenza vaccination uptake can be innovative by including solidary incentives and be successful in increasing uptake in HCWs. The cost of running a campaign such as this one is low.

Funder

Fundación Interhospitalaria para la Investigación Cardiovascular

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,Immunology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3