Capturing the Value of Vaccination within Health Technology Assessment and Health Economics—Practical Considerations for Expanding Valuation by Including Key Concepts

Author:

Biundo Eliana1ORCID,Dronova Mariia2,Chicoye Annie3,Cookson Richard4ORCID,Devlin Nancy5,Doherty T. Mark1,Garcia Stephanie1,Garcia-Ruiz Antonio J.6ORCID,Garrison Louis P.7,Nolan Terry5ORCID,Postma Maarten8910,Salisbury David11,Shah Hiral1,Sheikh Shazia1ORCID,Smith Richard12,Toumi Mondher13,Wasem Jurgen14ORCID,Beck Ekkehard1

Affiliation:

1. GSK, Building W23, 20 Avenue Fleming, 1300 Wavre, Belgium

2. Putnam PHMR, 30-701 Krakow, Poland

3. AC Health Consulting, Sciences Po, 75007 Paris, France

4. Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK

5. Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia

6. Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain

7. School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA

8. Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands

9. Department of Economics, Econometrics & Finance, Faculty of Economics & Business, University of Groningen, 9713 AB Groningen, The Netherlands

10. Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

11. Programme for Global Health, Royal Institute of International Affairs, Chatham House, London SW1Y 4LE, UK

12. College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2HZ, UK

13. Creativ-Ceutical, 1724 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

14. Institute for Health Care Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45127 Essen, Germany

Abstract

Following the development of a value of vaccination (VoV) framework for health technology assessment/cost-effectiveness analysis (HTA/CEA), and identification of three vaccination benefits for near-term inclusion in HTA/CEA, this final paper provides decision makers with methods and examples to consider benefits of health systems strengthening (HSS), equity, and macroeconomic gains. Expert working groups, targeted literature reviews, and case studies were used. Opportunity cost methods were applied for HSS benefits of rotavirus vaccination. Vaccination, with HSS benefits included, reduced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) by 1.4–50.5% (to GBP 11,552–GBP 23,016) depending on alternative conditions considered. Distributional CEA was applied for health equity benefits of meningococcal vaccination. Nearly 80% of prevented cases were among the three most deprived groups. Vaccination, with equity benefits included, reduced the ICER by 22–56% (to GBP 7014–GBP 12,460), depending on equity parameters. Macroeconomic models may inform HTA deliberative processes (e.g., disease impact on the labour force and the wider economy), or macroeconomic outcomes may be assessed for individuals in CEAs (e.g., impact on non-health consumption, leisure time, and income). These case studies show how to assess broader vaccination benefits in current HTA/CEA, providing decision makers with more accurate and complete VoV assessments. More work is needed to refine inputs and methods, especially for macroeconomic gains.

Funder

GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference100 articles.

1. Jit, M., Hutubessy, R., Png, M.E., Sundaram, N., Audimulam, J., Salim, S., and Yoong, J. (2015). The broader economic impact of vaccination: Reviewing and appraising the strength of evidence. BMC Med., 13.

2. Moving beyond traditional valuation of vaccination: Needs and opportunities;Bloom;Vaccine,2017

3. Steuten, L., Bell, E., and Neri, M. (2021, August 03). The Broader Value of Existing Vaccines in the Fight against COVID-19: Beware of Tunnel Vision. Available online: https://www.ohe.org/insight/broader-value-existing-vaccines-fight-against-covid-19-beware-tunnel-vision/.

4. Kamal-Bahl, S., Willke, R., Puckett, J.T., and Doshi, J.A. (2023, March 07). The Case for Using Novel Value Elements When Assessing COVID-19 Vaccines and Therapeutics. Available online: https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200616.451000/full/.

5. How should a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine be allocated? Health economists need to be ready to take the baton;Roope;Pharmacoecon. Open,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3