Selection Effects and COVID-19 Mortality Risk after Pfizer vs. Moderna Vaccination: Evidence from Linked Mortality and Vaccination Records
Author:
Atanasov Vladimir1, Barreto Natalia2ORCID, Whittle Jeff3, Meurer John3ORCID, Weston Benjamin W.3, Luo Qian (Eric)4ORCID, Yuan Andy Ye5ORCID, Franchi Lorenzo5, Zhang Ruohao6ORCID, Black Bernard5
Affiliation:
1. Mason College of Business, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA 2. Department of Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA 3. Medical College of Wisconsin; Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA 5. Pritzker School of Law, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA 6. Department of Agricultural Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16803, USA
Abstract
Prior research generally finds that the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA1273) COVID-19 vaccines provide similar protection against mortality, sometimes with a Moderna advantage due to slower waning. However, most comparisons do not address selection effects for those who are vaccinated and with which vaccine. We report evidence on large selection effects, and use a novel method to control for these effects. Instead of directly studying COVID-19 mortality, we study the COVID-19 excess mortality percentage (CEMP), defined as the COVID-19 deaths divided by non-COVID-19 natural deaths for the same population, converted to a percentage. The CEMP measure uses non-COVID-19 natural deaths to proxy for population health and control for selection effects. We report the relative mortality risk (RMR) for each vaccine relative to the unvaccinated population and to the other vaccine, using linked mortality and vaccination records for all adults in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, from 1 April 2021 through 30 June 2022. For two-dose vaccinees aged 60+, RMRs for Pfizer vaccinees were consistently over twice those for Moderna, and averaged 248% of Moderna (95% CI = 175%,353%). In the Omicron period, Pfizer RMR was 57% versus 23% for Moderna. Both vaccines demonstrated waning of two-dose effectiveness over time, especially for ages 60+. For booster recipients, the Pfizer–Moderna gap is much smaller and statistically insignificant. A possible explanation for the Moderna advantage for older persons is the higher Moderna dose of 100 μg, versus 30 μg for Pfizer. Younger persons (aged 18–59) were well-protected against death by two doses of either vaccine, and highly protected by three doses (no deaths among over 100,000 vaccinees). These results support the importance of a booster dose for ages 60+, especially for Pfizer recipients. They suggest, but do not prove, that a larger vaccine dose may be appropriate for older persons than for younger persons.
Funder
National Institutes of Health to the Medical College of Wisconsin, Clinical and Translational Science Institute of Southeast Wisconsin
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,Immunology
Reference48 articles.
1. European Center for Disease Control (2023, April 29). Effectiveness and Safety of EU/EEA-authorized Vaccines Against COVID-19: Living Systematic Review. Available online: https://covid19-vaccines-efficacy.ecdc.europa.eu. 2. UK Natinal Health Service (2023, April 26). About COVID-19 Vaccination. Available online: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/covid-19/covid-19-vaccination/about-covid-19-vaccination/. 3. US Centers for Disease Control (2023, April 26). Overview of COVID-19 Vaccination, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us.html#:~:text=COVID%2D19%20vaccination%20is%20recommended,date%20with%20COVID%2D19%20vaccination. 4. Postlicensure Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccines;Patel;JAMA,2020 5. Atanasov, V., Barreto, N., Whittle, J., Meurer, J., Weston, B.W., Luo, Q., Franchi, L., Yuan, A.Y., Zhang, R., and Black, B. (2023). Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against Death Using a Novel Measure: COVID Excess Mortality Percentage. Vaccines, 11.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|