Selection Effects and COVID-19 Mortality Risk after Pfizer vs. Moderna Vaccination: Evidence from Linked Mortality and Vaccination Records

Author:

Atanasov Vladimir1,Barreto Natalia2ORCID,Whittle Jeff3,Meurer John3ORCID,Weston Benjamin W.3,Luo Qian (Eric)4ORCID,Yuan Andy Ye5ORCID,Franchi Lorenzo5,Zhang Ruohao6ORCID,Black Bernard5

Affiliation:

1. Mason College of Business, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA

2. Department of Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL 61820, USA

3. Medical College of Wisconsin; Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA

4. Department of Health Policy and Management, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA

5. Pritzker School of Law, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA

6. Department of Agricultural Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA 16803, USA

Abstract

Prior research generally finds that the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) and Moderna (mRNA1273) COVID-19 vaccines provide similar protection against mortality, sometimes with a Moderna advantage due to slower waning. However, most comparisons do not address selection effects for those who are vaccinated and with which vaccine. We report evidence on large selection effects, and use a novel method to control for these effects. Instead of directly studying COVID-19 mortality, we study the COVID-19 excess mortality percentage (CEMP), defined as the COVID-19 deaths divided by non-COVID-19 natural deaths for the same population, converted to a percentage. The CEMP measure uses non-COVID-19 natural deaths to proxy for population health and control for selection effects. We report the relative mortality risk (RMR) for each vaccine relative to the unvaccinated population and to the other vaccine, using linked mortality and vaccination records for all adults in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, from 1 April 2021 through 30 June 2022. For two-dose vaccinees aged 60+, RMRs for Pfizer vaccinees were consistently over twice those for Moderna, and averaged 248% of Moderna (95% CI = 175%,353%). In the Omicron period, Pfizer RMR was 57% versus 23% for Moderna. Both vaccines demonstrated waning of two-dose effectiveness over time, especially for ages 60+. For booster recipients, the Pfizer–Moderna gap is much smaller and statistically insignificant. A possible explanation for the Moderna advantage for older persons is the higher Moderna dose of 100 μg, versus 30 μg for Pfizer. Younger persons (aged 18–59) were well-protected against death by two doses of either vaccine, and highly protected by three doses (no deaths among over 100,000 vaccinees). These results support the importance of a booster dose for ages 60+, especially for Pfizer recipients. They suggest, but do not prove, that a larger vaccine dose may be appropriate for older persons than for younger persons.

Funder

National Institutes of Health to the Medical College of Wisconsin, Clinical and Translational Science Institute of Southeast Wisconsin

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,Immunology

Reference48 articles.

1. European Center for Disease Control (2023, April 29). Effectiveness and Safety of EU/EEA-authorized Vaccines Against COVID-19: Living Systematic Review. Available online: https://covid19-vaccines-efficacy.ecdc.europa.eu.

2. UK Natinal Health Service (2023, April 26). About COVID-19 Vaccination. Available online: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/covid-19/covid-19-vaccination/about-covid-19-vaccination/.

3. US Centers for Disease Control (2023, April 26). Overview of COVID-19 Vaccination, Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/interim-considerations-us.html#:~:text=COVID%2D19%20vaccination%20is%20recommended,date%20with%20COVID%2D19%20vaccination.

4. Postlicensure Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccines;Patel;JAMA,2020

5. Atanasov, V., Barreto, N., Whittle, J., Meurer, J., Weston, B.W., Luo, Q., Franchi, L., Yuan, A.Y., Zhang, R., and Black, B. (2023). Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against Death Using a Novel Measure: COVID Excess Mortality Percentage. Vaccines, 11.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3