Assessing Potential Exemplars in Reducing Zero-Dose Children: A Novel Approach for Identifying Positive Outliers in Decreasing National Levels and Geographic Inequalities in Unvaccinated Children
Author:
Fullman Nancy1, Correa Gustavo C.2, Ikilezi Gloria1, Phillips David E.1, Reynolds Heidi W.2
Affiliation:
1. Exemplars in Global Health, Gates Ventures, 2401 Elliott Ave, Seattle, WA 98121, USA 2. Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Chemin du Pommier 40, Le Grand-Saconnex, 1218 Geneva, Switzerland
Abstract
Background: Understanding past successes in reaching unvaccinated or “zero-dose” children can help inform strategies for improving childhood immunization in other settings. Drawing from positive outlier methods, we developed a novel approach for identifying potential exemplars in reducing zero-dose children. Methods: Focusing on 2000–2019, we assessed changes in the percentage of under-one children with no doses of the diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis vaccine (no-DTP) across two geographic dimensions in 56 low- or lower-middle-income countries: (1) national levels; (2) subnational gaps, as defined as the difference between the 5th and 95th percentiles of no-DTP prevalence across second administrative units. Countries with the largest reductions for both metrics were considered positive outliers or potential ‘exemplars’, demonstrating exception progress in reducing national no-DTP prevalence and subnational inequalities. Last, so-called “neighborhood analyses” were conducted for the Gavi Learning Hub countries (Nigeria, Mali, Uganda, and Bangladesh), comparing them with countries that had similar no-DTP measures in 2000 but different trajectories through 2019. Results: From 2000 to 2019, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, and India had the largest absolute decreases for the two no-DTP dimensions—national prevalence and subnational gaps—while Bangladesh and Burundi registered the largest relative reductions for each no-DTP metric. Neighborhood analyses highlighted possible opportunities for cross-country learning among Gavi Learning Hub countries and potential exemplars in reducing zero-dose children. Conclusions: Identifying where exceptional progress has occurred is the first step toward better understanding how such gains could be achieved elsewhere. Further examination of how countries have successfully reduced levels of zero-dose children—especially across variable contexts and different drivers of inequality—could support faster, sustainable advances toward greater vaccination equity worldwide.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,Immunology
Reference62 articles.
1. The contribution of vaccination to global health: Past, present and future;Greenwood;Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.,2014 2. Estimating the Health Impact of Vaccination against Ten Pathogens in 98 Low-Income and Middle-Income Countries from 2000 to 2030: A Modelling Study;Li;Lancet,2021 3. WHO, and UNICEF (2022). Progress and Challenges with Achieving Universal Immunization Coverage: 2021 WHO/UNICEF Estimates of National Immunization Coverage (WUENIC). 4. Wendt, A., Santos, T.M., Cata-Preta, B.O., Arroyave, L., Hogan, D.R., Mengistu, T., Barros, A.J.D., and Victora, C.G. (2022). Exposure of Zero-Dose Children to Multiple Deprivation: Analyses of Data from 80 Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Vaccines, 10. 5. Wigley, A., Lorin, J., Hogan, D., Utazi, C.E., Hagedorn, B., Dansereau, E., Tatem, A.J., and Tejedor-Garavito, N. (2022). Estimates of the Number and Distribution of Zero-Dose and under-Immunised Children across Remote-Rural, Urban, and Conflict-Affected Settings in Low and Middle-Income Countries. PLOS Glob. Public Health, 2.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|