Towards a More Critical Public Health Understanding of Vaccine Hesitancy: Key Insights from a Decade of Research

Author:

Cooper Sara123ORCID,Wiysonge Charles S.145ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town 7505, South Africa

2. School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7935, South Africa

3. Department of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 7505, South Africa

4. HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban 4091, South Africa

5. Vaccine Preventable Diseases Programme, Universal Health Coverage/Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville P.O. Box 06, Congo

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy has gained renewed attention as an important public health concern worldwide. Against this backdrop, over the last decade, we have conducted various qualitative, social science studies with the broad shared aim of better understanding this complex phenomenon. This has included various Cochrane systematic reviews of qualitative research globally, systematic reviews of qualitative research in Africa, and primary research studies in South Africa. These studies have also explored vaccine hesitancy for various vaccines, including routine childhood vaccination, HPV vaccination and other routine vaccinations for adolescents, and, most recently, COVID-19 vaccination. In this reflective and critical commentary piece we reflect on seven key overarching insights we feel we have gained about this complex phenomenon from the varying studies we have conducted over the past decade. These insights comprise the following: (1) the relationship between vaccine knowledge and hesitancy is complex and may operate in multiple directions; (2) vaccine hesitancy is driven by multiple socio-political forces; (3) vaccine hesitancy may be many things, rather than a single phenomenon; (4) vaccine hesitancy may be an ongoing ‘process’, rather than a fixed ‘stance’; (5) vaccine hesitancy may sometimes be about a ‘striving’, rather than a ‘resisting’; (6) ‘distrust’ as a driver of vaccine hesitancy needs to be better contextualized and disaggregated; and (7) the ‘demand-side’ versus ‘supply/access-side’ distinction of the drivers of suboptimal vaccination may be misleading and unhelpful. In unpacking these insights, we problematize some of the common assumptions within the vaccine hesitancy literature and flag topics that we think could benefit from further scrutiny and debate. Our hope is that this can provide a platform for further engagement on these issues and ultimately contribute towards fostering a more critical public health understanding of vaccine hesitancy.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,Immunology

Reference54 articles.

1. A Crisis of Public Confidence in Vaccines;Black;Sci. Transl. Med.,2010

2. The Vaccine-Hesitant Moment;Larson;N. Engl. J. Med.,2022

3. The Vaccine Confidence Project (2019, February 01). The State of Vaccine Confidence. Available online: www.vaccineconfidence.org.

4. Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: Influence, impact and implications;Vivion;Expert Rev. Vaccines,2014

5. Science Denial and COVID Conspiracy Theories: Potential Neurological Mechanisms and Possible Responses;Miller;JAMA,2020

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3