Deepening Our Understanding of COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making amongst Healthcare Workers in Southwest Virginia, USA Using Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Author:

Bendetson Jesse1ORCID,Swann Mandy C.2,Lozano Alicia3,West Jennifer3,Hanlon Alexandra L.3,Crandell Ian3,Jatta Maimuna2ORCID,Schleupner Charles J.145,Baffoe-Bonnie Anthony1245ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA

2. Infection Prevention and Control Section, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA 24014, USA

3. Virginia Tech Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA

4. Section of Infectious Diseases, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA 24014, USA

5. Department of Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA 24014, USA

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) has been a major challenge throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. While many studies have identified HCW characteristics and specific attitudes associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, researchers are still working towards developing a holistic understanding of the psychological constructs that influence COVID-19 vaccine decision-making in this population. Between 15 March and 29 March 2021, we distributed an online survey assessing individual characteristics and vaccine-related perceptions to employees of a not-for-profit healthcare system in Southwest Virginia (N = 2459). We then performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to describe patterns of vaccine-related thought amongst HCWs and identify latent psychometric constructs involved in vaccine decision-making. The goodness of model fit was assessed using the Tucker–Lewis Index (TLI), the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). Internal consistency and reliability of each factor were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. EFA identified four latent psychometric constructs: Lack of trust in the COVID-19 vaccine; Anti-science sentiment; Adverse side-effects; and Situational risk assessment. The goodness of EFA model fit was adequate (TLI > 0.90, RMSEA ≤ 0.08) with acceptable internal consistency and reliability for three of four factors (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.70). The CFA model also had adequate goodness of fit (CFI > 0.90, RMSEA ≤ 0.08). We believe the psychometric constructs identified in this study can provide a useful framework for interventions to improve vaccine uptake amongst this critical population.

Funder

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health

Virginia Tech Libraries

Carilion Clinic Department of Internal Medicine

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,Immunology

Reference54 articles.

1. CDC (2023, January 21). COVID Data Tracker, Available online: https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home.

2. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine;Polack;N. Engl. J. Med.,2020

3. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine;Baden;N. Engl. J. Med.,2021

4. Safety and Efficacy of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S Vaccine against Covid-19;Sadoff;N. Engl. J. Med.,2021

5. Efficacy and Safety of NVX-CoV2373 in Adults in the United States and Mexico;Dunkle;N. Engl. J. Med.,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3