Real-World Safety and Efficacy Clinical Data of an Improved Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy Product for the Treatment of Bee Venom Allergy

Author:

Gonzalez Guzman Luis Alfredo1,García Robaina Jose Carlos2,Barrios Recio Javier2,Escudero Arias Elena3,Liñares Mata Tania3,Cervera Aznar Raquel4,De La Roca Pinzón Federico5,Miguel Polo Lissette del Carmen6,Arenas Villarroel Luis7,López Couso Verónica P.8ORCID,Alcover Diaz Javier8,Rodriguez Gil David8ORCID,Pelaez Ricardo Palacios8,Carballada Gonzalez Francisco Javier1

Affiliation:

1. Allergy Department, Hospital Lucus Augusti, 27003 Lugo, Spain

2. Allergy Department, Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria University Hospital, 38010 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain

3. Allergy Department, Hospital Provincial de Pontevedra, 36001 Pontevedra, Spain

4. Allergy Department, Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, 12004 Castelló de la Plana, Spain

5. Allergy Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain

6. Allergy Department, Hospital Virgen De La Luz, 16002 Cuenca, Spain

7. Allergy Department, Hospital do Meixoeiro, 36214 Vigo, Spain

8. Laboratorios de Diagnóstico y Aplicaciones (Diater), 28919 Madrid, Spain

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the safety and efficacy of bee venom immunotherapy without HSA, in real-life patients. Methods: This is an observational retrospective study developed in seven hospitals in Spain, where patients treated with this immunotherapy were included. They gathered the protocol used to initiate the immunotherapy, adverse reactions, field re-stings, and the patient clinical data (clinical history, biomarkers, and skin prick test). Results: A total of 108 patients were included. In total, 4 protocols were used (5 weeks reaching 200 μg, and 4, 3, and 2 weeks reaching 100 μg). An incidence of systemic adverse reactions for each 100 injections of 1.5, 1.7, 0, and 0.58, respectively, was found. The demographic data showed not to directly affect the appearance of adverse reactions, except for those having a grade 2 systemic reaction with immunotherapy previously had a grade 4 systemic reaction; the IgE to Apis mellifera was 3 times higher in patients with systemic reactions of grade 1 than in the general group, and other specific IgEs were lower in those with systemic reactions. Most of the patients recognized Api m 1 followed by Api m 10. In the sample, 32% experienced spontaneous re-stings, without presenting systemic reactions, after a year of treatment.

Funder

Diater Laboratorios S.A.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Infectious Diseases,Drug Discovery,Pharmacology,Immunology

Reference39 articles.

1. Hipersensibilidad a veneno de himenópteros;Protoc. Diagn. Pediatr.,2013

2. Manejo práctico de las picaduras de insecto en Atención Primaria;Rev. Pediatría Atención Primaria,2015

3. Diagnosis of Hymenoptera Venom;Rueff;Allergy,2005

4. Prevention and treatment of hymenoptera venom allergy: Guidelines for clinical practice;Bonifazi;Allergy,2005

5. EAACI guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: Hymenoptera venom allergy;Sturm;Allergy,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3