Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion

Author:

Stanley John1ORCID,Stanley Janet2

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies, The University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

2. School of Design, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

Abstract

Enabling people to be socially included is a high-priority goal for many governments but monetised benefit measures applicable to initiatives intended to reduce social exclusion risk are lacking in land use transport, and other, policy arenas. In settings where the decision-making process seeks guidance from cost-benefit analysis, this is likely to disadvantage initiatives intended to reduce exclusion. This is a particular problem for public transport services intended to enable people to access more of the opportunities available in their society (‘social transit’). This paper develops a monetised measure of the value of improved mobility as it contributes to reducing risk of social exclusion, showing this to make a material difference to benefit estimates from social transit service improvements. It also develops monetised benefit estimates for some other potential pathways for reducing risk of social exclusion, particularly changes in bridging and bonding social capital, sense of community, subjective wellbeing and neighbourhood disadvantage. The research thus provides an opportunity to significantly strengthen appraisal tools linked to reducing social exclusion, which should encourage more integrated approaches to reducing exclusion and improve implementation prospects for initiatives with that purpose. Reduced social exclusion is a likely outcome.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference89 articles.

1. The World Commission on Environment and Development, Commission (1987). For the Future Our Common Future: United Nations, Oxford University Press.

2. HM Treasury (2022). The Green Book: Central Government Guidance on Appraisal and Evaluation, HM Treasury. Available online: https://www.gihub.org/resources/publications/the-green-book-central-government-guidance-on-appraisal-and-evaluation/.

3. NSW Treasury (2023, July 02). TPG 23—08: NSW Government Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis, Available online: https://www.treasury.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-04/tpg23-08_nsw-government-guide-to-cost-benefit-analysis_202304.pdf.

4. Incomplete cost—incomplete benefit analysis in transport appraisal;Hickman;Transp. Rev.,2017

5. An evaluation of cost-benefit analysis criteria Scott;Nash;J. Political Econ.,1975

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3